Well damn, a WMD has just gone off under Tony Blairs chair, savage.
Summary - http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/media/...ve-summary.pdf
Well damn, a WMD has just gone off under Tony Blairs chair, savage.
Summary - http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/media/...ve-summary.pdf
If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.
I understand the Report concludes that not all peaceful options had been exhausted, in dealing with Saddam ??
Nonsense, of course.
Saddam had spent many years in mucking the UN about. All Blix's people could ever do was to go to sites chosen by Saddam's people, and check them out (to the extent they could even do that !). Nobody could search the whole of Iraq for WMD's, which made Blix's actions farcical in the extreme. There was simply NO WAY to conclude that WMD's did not exist in Iraq.
Therefore, action had to be taken that was decisive, that settled the issue. Bush and Blair followed through in the only truly useful way possible.
And for this, Chilcot (the Inquiry commissioned by Gordon Brown, a RIVAL of Blair's ..) was ordered to investigate and come up with his Inquiry. It has taken SEVEN YEARS for Chilcot to deal with this ... if the issues involved were 'clear cut' and a position discernible ... HOW COME we had such an enormous delay ???
It stinks, Noir, and if you're being honest, you'll admit it does.
It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!
The report has taken far too long to come out, but those who have have been devouring its contents have commented on the unparalleled level detail of the report, so it may be that an investigation of this nature simply needs this amount of time for completion without diminishing the contents.
Great to see your already drawn your own conclusion on a 2 million word document that you haven't read. Makes it all worthwhile eh?Originally Posted by Drummond
Personally I look forward to reading it, I hope that you do to.
Last edited by Noir; 07-06-2016 at 07:32 AM.
If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.
If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.
The U.S. needs its own Chilcot report. To investigate George W Bush for his idiot decision to invade Iraq. Perhaps they can get Trump to testify.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...eport-iraq-war
Just got home from a class taught by a former CIA director of operations (Middle East particularly) who said we didn't think there were WMDs in Iraq. We knew there were. As did the Russians, the Germans,and the Israelis, to name a few.
After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown
“Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
-Abbey
"when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
"You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
“Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho
1. Never heard that. Everyone talks about how Bush lied, etc., because there were no WMDs.
2. Is there a difference between owning WMD's and having a "program"? I would contend that ownership is a program.
3. My CIA prof seems to think the issue was whether they existed or not. No mention of a program being the issue.
After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown
“Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
-Abbey
It was idiotic to act to remove a brutal regime from power, one that had links to terrorists, one that bankrolled Hamas, one that had DEPLOYED a WMD against the Kurds .. yet, somehow, we were all supposed to 'know' that Saddam had no stock of WMD's ... and this ... just because SADDAM SAID SO ??
Going to however many sites Blix's team were led to, and have that team verify them to be sites where WMD's may have been neutralised .. said nothing at all about any REMAINING stocks. Short of physically scouring the entirety of Iraq for the sake of failing to find any being held, how else could the truth be determined ? Blix had no hope of doing that himself.
Only an invasion could hope to achieve such an aim, AND kill off any chance of their being used, or traded ... whatever.
According to Chilcot's 'findings', not all peaceful avenues had been explored with Saddam. Leaving aside the obvious one of just surrendering to Saddam and deciding he could do what he wanted, with whatever he had (!!!) ... can ANYONE suggest any alternative 'peaceful' outcome being available at the time ??
It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!
I have lost my mind. If found, please give it a snack and return it?
"I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same of others"...John Wayne in "The Shootist"
A Deplorable!
Saddam said in his jail cell that he wanted Iran to BELIEVE he had WMDs.
Grain of salt. But an interesting tidbit.
Sometimes you are a complete idiot.
What has Trump got to do with Bush carrying out a UN Mandate?
That the UN Attorney-General was involved with the 'Oil for Food' scam under the table matters not to you.
Saddam thumbing his nose at the USA and the rest of the world for 8 years matters not to you.
Obama refusing to agree to a Status of Forces pact in Iraq and pulling out like a coward, means
nothing to You.
Obama birthed ISIS....yet you fool liberals always deny it. "Junior Varsity"....yeah, sure. Now they are
global thanks to Obama and Clinton.
I have lost my mind. If found, please give it a snack and return it?
"I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same of others"...John Wayne in "The Shootist"
A Deplorable!