Rigged? In What Way Is This Election NOT Rigged?

[Kathianne]

pretty sad

He is, without a doubt a propagandist.

[jimnyc]

Only those who know they lost give up the rigged election cry. It's a last ditched effort and sad at that. An election can be rigged at a local level, not national. Busing in a few hundred people to vote twice does not make any difference.

Even if it were only one person voting fraudulently, that would be far too many. And they add up after awhile, hence so many current investigations going on.

And election can't be rigged nationally? Then there was no reason for the media to get involved, and to send questions behind the scenes and such. What would be the point? Same with the FBi/DOJ - and that's EXACTLY what they did in absolving Hillary - is rig the election. Many of you can ignore this forever, but it still happened, and the media/FBI/FOJ/Administration have all worked together to keep Hillary out of legal trouble and into the WH

[gabosaurus]

Excuses are the last resort of those who have lost confidence in their actions.

[bullypulpit]

Yes, the election IS rigged, but not the way some of y'all think.

"Wisconsin clerk limits voting near campus because ‘students lean more toward the Democrats’"

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/reve...the-democrats/

[jimnyc]

Ri doubleG ed

The media, the president, the entire administration, the DOJ and the FBI in the worst way of course. Various states and then dead people. I see LOTS of dead people, over 4 million of them in fact.

r - i DOUBLE G - ed

[pete311]

Ri doubleG ed

The media, the president, the entire administration, the DOJ and the FBI in the worst way of course. Various states and then dead people. I see LOTS of dead people, over 4 million of them in fact.

r - i DOUBLE G - ed

If Trump was winning you wouldn't bring this up. This is loser talk.

[jimnyc]

If Trump was winning you wouldn't bring this up. This is loser talk.

Sure, loser talk. But yet there are active investigations in various states about voter fraud, and more. There is proven collusion between the media and Hillary's campaign. There is proof that questions were provided ahead of time during the primaries. There is proof that they screwed Bernie Sanders. The DOJ and the FBI ensured no charges and helped Hillary all along, and continue to do so. You can call it whatever you like, but the events still happened, lose or win. She'll just be the first winner who was proven to have lied to the FBI and got away with an illegal server and was nailed lying about that server endless times. Pinocchio's nose would be like 42 feet long if Hillary were in charge.

You can call it any type of talk you like, even loser talk. But the talk has been proven both criminally - and now rigging the election.

[gabosaurus]

Ri doubleG ed

The media, the president, the entire administration, the DOJ and the FBI in the worst way of course. Various states and then dead people. I see LOTS of dead people, over 4 million of them in fact.

r - i DOUBLE G - ed

There have always been dead people on the voter rolls. People often die without informing their local governments. I don't know how often the voter rolls are updated, but it is obviously not too often.
How many dead people voted in the last general election? Any?

[Drummond]

If Trump was winning you wouldn't bring this up. This is loser talk.

If Trump was winning, the media and propaganda onslaught on him would no doubt intensify. Non-provable accusations would be so plentiful that the average citizen would feel s/he was drowning in them.

How much of any of the sleaze claimed about Trump was in evidence, until just a handful of weeks ago ? And WHY WASN'T IT, if there's truth to be told ?

Trump reserves the right to question the election's result if he loses it. But, of course he does. Why should he accept an election where the victory was founded on deliberate and intensified attempts at disreputable squalid character-assassination ?

Voters have a total right to be able to judge those they want to elect, in a fair, honest way .. to see them as they are .. and not have their judgements skewed for them courtesy of sheer weight of propaganda designed only to harm and mislead.

[Abbey Marie]

If Trump was winning you wouldn't bring this up. This is loser talk.

So in your world of relative morality, the ends always justify the means. Got it.

[OCA]

Ol'Donny can question the results as much as he wants hell even up her jan 20 inauguration. What he can't do however is incite his brown shirts to violence.

[aboutime]

There have always been dead people on the voter rolls. People often die without informing their local governments. I don't know how often the voter rolls are updated, but it is obviously not too often.
How many dead people voted in the last general election? Any?

Spoken like a typical liberal gabby. Of course, you didn't include, as part of your question..."How many dead people will the Democrats take the place of...at polls for THIS ELECTION?"

There would be no need to report DEAD people voting if it was true...NONE OF THEM VOTED.
So...your DNC style, liberal, unspoken portion of the question disqualifies YOU from the start.