Results 1 to 15 of 72

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    I hear you. I fear some will just give a 'piss off' to anything they disagree with. Personally on that I'd consider the source.

    I like the idea of possibly using for some of the troll posts or something I find offensive. Troll posts in my opinion don't require a response, offensive posts-let's say basic racism, I'd likely post a reply to.

    Neg rep to me is basically 'I hate you,' it's personal. Thus, I don't do that or at least haven't for years, probably MaineMan?
    Exactly, my first 'piss off' received was for asking someone to expand on a statement they made (I wasn't even being sarcastic ) they didn't otherwise reply. To me that seems an awful lot like trolling - for it should be considered that they did nothing except quote the post made and reply with "Piss off." I don't understand why people want that feature.
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,262
    Thanks (Given)
    34672
    Thanks (Received)
    26726
    Likes (Given)
    2577
    Likes (Received)
    10197
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    376 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475531

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noir View Post
    Exactly, my first 'piss off' received was for asking someone to expand on a statement they made (I wasn't even being sarcastic ) they didn't otherwise reply. To me that seems an awful lot like trolling - for it should be considered that they did nothing except quote the post made and reply with "Piss off." I don't understand why people want that feature.
    THAT is why I don't like it. You can say what you want about me, but I have never neg repped you and won't tell you to piss off. Unless I say it to your face. And whoever wants to get pissed at me can, but it's a cheap tool to backstab people instead of confronting them.

    Of course we got a laundry list of lefties that won't confront others. SO don't come whining to me about a tool tailored for YOU.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Wales, UK
    Posts
    11,895
    Thanks (Given)
    20722
    Thanks (Received)
    8222
    Likes (Given)
    2213
    Likes (Received)
    1128
    Piss Off (Given)
    5
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19319418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noir View Post
    Exactly, my first 'piss off' received was for asking someone to expand on a statement they made (I wasn't even being sarcastic ) they didn't otherwise reply. To me that seems an awful lot like trolling - for it should be considered that they did nothing except quote the post made and reply with "Piss off." I don't understand why people want that feature.
    I see your point to some extent, though I also can't agree. The simple fact of the matter is that the response anyone chooses to make to a post they see, is theirs to make (and for others to comprehend) ... and surely not for you to govern the detail of the response which is chosen.

    The feature we're discussing can be used in a particular way according to the choice of the user. This is as it should be.
    It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums