Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    48,670
    Thanks (Given)
    25128
    Thanks (Received)
    18582
    Likes (Given)
    10520
    Likes (Received)
    7063
    Piss Off (Given)
    86
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475538

    Default 11 Judicial Nominees

    He is picking good judges, pretty much sticking with the list The Federalist Society put out or at least those that adhere to those parameters. More academics/Constitutionalists.

    http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/20...ederal-judges/


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  2. Thanks NightTrain thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Wasilla, Alaska
    Posts
    14,007
    Thanks (Given)
    8505
    Thanks (Received)
    15346
    Likes (Given)
    3318
    Likes (Received)
    3868
    Piss Off (Given)
    27
    Piss Off (Received)
    4
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475191

    Default

    Good move filling Gorsuch's old position on the 10th.

    It is such an important duty to properly fill vacancies with solid judges. We end up with chaos with bad judges, as we've observed recently - nothing worse than judicial activism overriding the rule of law.


    On another note, I haven't heard any more rumblings about breaking up the 9th. That really does need to be done - AK is under their thumb and I cringe every time a case goes before them.
    Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums