he's wrong too. his premise is ridiculous.
(shrug)
Luke uses 'hamartía' - which means in essence 'a self-created failure - to miss the mark, to fail, a failure or failures." In the context of the prayer it's rightly translated as 'sin'.
Mathew prefered opheiletēs - in talking about those who owe us by means of them failing us. In the context of the prayer it's rightly translated as 'those who sin against us'
But taking specific words without considering common use and context shows intellectual dishonesty.
More silliness in that link:
"...Crucifixion being a punishment reserved especially for political dissidents."
Such bullshit because to the Romans anything counter-roman-law was 'political dissidence' in a way. It's like saying "They did that only for criminals!" Stupid. Written account tells us Romans crucified as a punishment for traitors, rebels, robbers and criminal slaves. Rudimentary research would have brought that to light before the guy wrote his dribble.
Adding to that - if one believes scripture, one knows 'sin' or 'debts' are already paid and over-with. The ending has already happened or is-happening in one big cosmic 'now' as God resides outside of time itself. Thus, everything that 'will' happen from our perspective has already happened from another perspective. And sin and death are no-more and there is nothing to stress, debate, worry, accuse, or feel guilty about.
“… the greatest detractor from high performance is fear: fear that you are not prepared, fear that you are in over your head, fear that you are not worthy, and ultimately, fear of failure. If you can eliminate that fear—not through arrogance or just wishing difficulties away, but through hard work and preparation—you will put yourself in an incredibly powerful position to take on the challenges you face" - Pete Carroll.