Whistleblower Complaint Involves Trump Communication With Foreign Leader

[Russ]

Russ... seriously... the White House are illegally blocking the whistleblower reports so no shit there is lack of information. If this is nothing then why illegally block the report?

You're just repeating the CNN lines, and you know it. The White House didn't "illegally" block the whistleblower reports - the DNI guy blocked releasing the whistleblower report on his own authority. You can guess that the White House asked him to do it, like CNN, but that is just your guess.

[Russ]

On Tuesday afternoon, President Trump announced on Twitter that he has "authorized the release tomorrow of the complete, fully declassified and unredacted transcript of my phone conversation with President Zelensky of Ukraine." This came less than two hours before House Democrats are set to meet to discuss launching an impeachment investigation. Trump seems extremely confident that releasing the transcript will vindicate him. "You will see it was a very friendly and totally appropriate call," he tweeted. "No pressure and, unlike Joe Biden and his son, NO quid pro quo! This is nothing more than a continuation of the Greatest and most Destructive Witch Hunt of all time!"



Rest - https://pjmedia.com/trending/breakin...ian-president/

I heard that Chucky Schumer has already said that somehow he's 'not satisfied with releasing the entire, unredacted transcript of the call between Trump and Zelensky'. Besides Chucky making himself look like a completely pathetic idiot, (a finely-honed skill he has practiced constantly over the years) this makes it sound like Chucky is already expecting that the transcript will make Trump look just fine. It will be just like the Mueller Report - no evidence against Trump, and the Dems sobbing like little kids.

[Russ]

One other thing - how is any part of Trump's call to the Ukraine any different from what Joe Biden did a few years back, and then bragged about it to the media? We don't even need a transcript - Joe bragged about it.

[BoogyMan]

[pete311]

It wasn’t a political opponent you stupid fucks. Why is that so hard to understand. Ukraine reporters also said everyone was trying to get the prosecutor fired because he wasn’t pursuing corruption. The story is all bogus. You guys are fixated on the diversion. It’s a non story. No crime.

[pete311]

I heard that Chucky Schumer has already said that somehow he's 'not satisfied with releasing the entire, unredacted transcript of the call between Trump and Zelensky'. Besides Chucky making himself look like a completely pathetic idiot, (a finely-honed skill he has practiced constantly over the years) this makes it sound like Chucky is already expecting that the transcript will make Trump look just fine. It will be just like the Mueller Report - no evidence against Trump, and the Dems sobbing like little kids.

The whistleblower has noted there is a string of evidence. It’s not just about the call which is why we need the report and the blower to testify.

[LongTermGuy]

It wasn’t a political opponent you stupid fucks. Why is that so hard to understand. Ukraine reporters also said everyone was trying to get the prosecutor fired because he wasn’t pursuing corruption. The story is all bogus. You guys are fixated on the diversion. It’s a non story. No crime.

You so angry Pete..calling us bad names.....You guys (leftist) got nothing and you know it....One day soon pete you too will be yelling at the sky...again.

[BoogyMan]

The whistleblower has noted there is a string of evidence. It’s not just about the call which is why we need the report and the blower to testify.

Pete, you have seen the whistleblower report? If so, I am sure someone in the FBI is going to want to talk to you. Else, you lie.

[icansayit]

Pete, you have seen the whistleblower report? If so, I am sure someone in the FBI is going to want to talk to you. Else, you lie.

Is that right petey? Or is your real name....Jim Comey? Or....Jerry Nadless, or Chucky Cheeze Schumer.

Someone might like to know about your SIX FIGURE whistleblower status.

[jimnyc]

It wasn’t a political opponent you stupid fucks. Why is that so hard to understand. Ukraine reporters also said everyone was trying to get the prosecutor fired because he wasn’t pursuing corruption. The story is all bogus. You guys are fixated on the diversion. It’s a non story. No crime.

"WWWWaaaaAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! I'm gonna cry. Why are you people not falling for THIS one? I see it falling apart before it even starts. It pisses me off that no matter how many times I think I have them and him, it turns out to be bogus, and boy that angers me!"

...

You didn't care about what Biden did and STILL don't, so don't act like suddenly you can about corruption. Here - you WANT to see what happened, as you're not sure. Biden - there is multiple videos of him admitting to what he did with Ukraine, and you couldn't care less.

So one is proven, and you don't care. The other is an alleged accusation that needs investigation - and that bothers you to your triggered core!

Pathetic Comedy Gold Continues!!!

[jimnyc]

Now here is some serious truth. This is the kind of stuff that the leaders fear and push. And then of course the following lackies listen to whatever they puke out. And then the littlest of weenies of course just sit around triggered all the time talking about how great they are and how the rest of us suck.

---

Why the Democrats Have Gone Insane

Impeach! Impeach, they say! If only he were Buckingham, they would take off his head as well. Trump has become the Democrats' version of Richard III, if he wasn't already. (Okay, he was.)

They even moved to open an impeachment "inquiry" (whatever that means -- a little bit chicken, if you ask me -- they've been doing it for the last three years anyway) after Trump announced he was making his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky public Wednesday in unredacted form. And now he's announcing the whistleblower's complaint, whatever hand it is -- second, third, who knows? -- will be released later in the week. Talk about a reckless jumping of the gun on the Democrats' parts. This reeks of outright panic.

So what's really going on here? Why have the Democrats, to put it bluntly, gone berserk? Why are they risking a backlash of cosmic proportions (other than appeasing their psychotically-inflamed base, of course)?

One, distraction. They live in absolute fear of the coming revelations about the Russia probe, from Inspector General Horowitz but even more from the DOJ's John Durham, who can actually put people in jail. The Dems know -- if they have a brain (and a few do) -- these revelations are likely to point up the line at the leaders of the Democratic Party all the way to President Obama. They were all involved to one degree or another with illegally spying on or undermining Trump and his administration and supporters before and after the election. The extent of this we are only beginning to understand.

To put it mildly, not good. Whether you call this treason is up to you, but you can be sure Middle America (i. e. those elusive independent voters) will not appreciate it.

But there's something worse -- and Pelosi's knows it. The only hope for Democrats to defeat Trump is, remote and quixotic as it may be, impeachment. In the midst of the current brouhaha, Joe Biden -- their great (alas white male) hope -- is being exposed as not just a senile plagiarist, but a senile, corrupt plagiarist with a freaky family out of a Southern gothic novel with tentacles reaching into China and Ukraine. Again, not good.

Unfortunately, the rest of the Dems have tacked so far to the left that they wouldn't be able to win an election in Shenyang. Sanders, speaking of senility, is almost risible. He wants to restrict population for reasons of "climate change" when every one of the myriad social programs he so vehemently urges depends on strong continued population growth for economic survival, irrespective of taxes. (Is he that stupid? I don't think so. He's just a liar.)

As for his somewhat subtle clone, Ms. Warren, her proposals are if anything more extreme because she fails to acknowledge (though Colbert did his best to encourage her) that they are going to cost a ton of taxpayer money that approaches national bankruptcy. Even taxing the rich at one hundred percent won't come near supporting her ideas. Wait until Trump gets ahold of that.

So for the Democrats, trouble ahead, trouble behind. Ergo, impeachment.

Of course it will never happen. (Pelosi knows that too. That's why she never held a congressional vote on this "inquiry.") And indeed the whole spectacle might be amusing in a macabre sort of way if there weren't important things going on in the world. The president is engaged in negotiations of tremendous significance with the Chinese and trying to neuter as much as possible the violent mullahs of Iran, but the Democrats don't care. In fact, they would prefer he fail, and seem to be doing everything in their power to make it so. To call that un-American is an understatement. Actually, it's despicable and deeply immoral, not just for the citizens of this country, but for the world. What children!

https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/why-...e-gone-insane/

[jimnyc]

An interesting one minute listen - before Joe started hitting the Alzheimer's years...

[jimnyc]

Interesting. (What hjmick wrote about!)

You'll agree that this needs to be seriously looked into, right Pete?


Democrats Wrote to Ukraine in May 2018, Demanding It Investigate Trump

Democrats wrote to the Ukrainian government in May 2018 urging it to continue investigations into President Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia in the 2016 presidential campaign — collusion later found not to exist.

The demand, which came from U.S. Senators Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Dick Durbin (D-IL), and Patrick Leahy (D-VT), resurfaced Wednesday in an opinion piece written by conservative Marc Thiessen in the Washington Post.

Ironically, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) declared Tuesday that the mere possibility that President Trump had asked Ukraine to continue an investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden — even without a quid pro quo — was enough to trigger an impeachment inquiry. (Biden boasted in 2018 that he had forced Ukraine to remove its prosecutor by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid; he did not tell his audience at the Council on Foreign Relations that the prosecutor was looking into a firm on whose board his son, Hunter Biden, was serving.)

Thiessen observed (original links):

It got almost no attention, but in May [2018], CNN reported that Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they implied that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake. Describing themselves as “strong advocates for a robust and close relationship with Ukraine,” the Democratic senators declared, “We have supported [the] capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these [democratic] principles to avoid the ire of President Trump,” before demanding Lutsenko “reverse course and halt any efforts to impede cooperation with this important investigation.”

Rest - https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...stigate-trump/

[jimnyc]

More not surprising crap BS. And the timing, just enough to try and ruin Trump's campaign, of which WILL backfire, as I stated for a long time now. But some more good info to keep into the mix...


Fox News: IG Found ‘Whistleblower’ Had ‘Political Bias’ in Favor of Trump 2020 Rival

Ed Henry of Fox News reported Tuesday evening on Hannity that the Office of Intelligence Community Inspector General found that the so-called “whistleblower” who raised concerns about President Donald Trump’s discussions with foreign leaders had a “political bias” in favor of one of Trump’s rivals in the 2020 presidential election.

The inspector general’s report has, thus far, been withheld by the administration.

Democrats allege that the Trump administration is violating the law in keeping the report from Congress, which was the chief reason cited Tuesday by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for changing her mind and supporting an impeachment inquiry.

It is not clear why the administration had withheld the report, though the White House announced Tuesday that it will release the report Wednesday, along with the transcript of Trump’s conversation with the new president of Ukraine.

Henry, citing a “senior official” with first-hand knowledge of the inspector general’s report, said that the anonymous “whistleblower” — who did not hear Trump’s conversation directly — was biased in favor of one of Trump’s 2020 opponents, though the official did not say which one.

Henry also said the official had told him that there would be no “smoking gun” in the transcript of Trump’s conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — even though there would be “at least a few words” in it that would cause unspecified problems for the White House.

Hannity added that his sources had also told him that Trump and Zelensky had only briefly discussed the aborted investigation into a company on whose board Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President Joe Biden, had served. Biden boasted last year that he had forced the Ukrainian prosecutor out by threatening to withhold $1 billion in aid.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...mp-2020-rival/


Whistleblower Lawyer’s Resume Includes Work for Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer

The whistleblower who sparked a political firestorm after claiming that President Trump pressed Ukraine’s leader to re-open an inquiry into Hunter Biden’s business dealings is represented by national security lawyer Mark Zaid, a frequent Trump critic, as well as Andrew Bakaj, who worked for former Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) announced on Tuesday that the whistleblower expressed a desire to speak to the committee and confirmed that lawmakers are speaking to his or her counsel. Schiff added that the testimony could come as “soon as this week”:



The announcement sparked questions about the lawyers representing the whistleblower. Andrew P. Bakaj, a former CIA official and founding/partnering manager of the Washington DC-based Compass Rose Legal Group, is one of the attorneys representing the whistleblower. He and the firm specialize in “adverse security clearance actions, whistleblower activities, and individuals, corporations, and organizations who are facing criminal and/or administrative investigations.”

Rest - https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...chuck-schumer/

[jimnyc]

“Biden Does Have A Problem” On Ukraine Says… CNN Contributor

While most of the people in media are pushing the Democrat narrative on Ukraine, they are ignoring Joe Biden’s problems on this issue.

One contributor on CNN spoke out though, and he was quite frank.

Joe Biden has a problem here.


The Washington Free Beacon reports:

Burisma ‘Clearly’ Paid Hunter Biden to Sell Influence, Says CNN Contributor

Joe Biden’s family ties to an influence peddling scheme at a Ukrainian gas company could hurt the former vice president’s 2020 campaign, political scientist Ian Bremmer told CNN on Tuesday.

“[Joe] Biden does have a problem here. I have to say $50,000 a month for Hunter Biden—clearly to be selling influence because otherwise, no one would ever pay him that kind of money—for a company that, frankly, was pretty corrupt and has been before and has been since under investigation,” Bremmer said….

“It’s hard to imagine Joe Biden wasn’t aware of it,” Bremmer said. “I expect that President Obama, if he had known about the reality of the situation, would’ve probably told Biden ‘get rid of this, we shouldn’t have your son working in this situation.’ That would have cost him something. I fear even if maybe Biden wasn’t aware but Biden should’ve been aware that that would cause an issue for him.”

Rest, and video - https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ributor-video/