How does it not based on the graphs provided? Reworking the graphs doesn't change the point. Your graph may show the relative difference between infection, hospitalization, and death but the original graph proves? the claim that there are lower instances of each. They didn't use fake numbers unless you're alleging that as well.
So when the EUA ends and it's fully approved will much of the resistance melt away? From how I see it there is far less risk in getting the vaccine than not and every thread that's been started recently, and there have been a lot,
you'd think it's going to be a self induced apocalypse.
Is it being oversold? I surely know it's being sold hard but the resistance from the other side has been moreso. Hanging arguments on miniscule fine print in studies, etc. used in vaccine research for example. The examples have been less than impressive IMO.
I agree that people can make their own choices but some of the arguments are ridiculous.
Reworking numbers doesn't create validation of what you see as a falsehood. But yes, I think we're better off with them.
But to dispel my apparent shill cred
if you want the vaccine, get the vaccine. If you don't want the vaccine, don't get the vaccine. Make your choices.