Results 1 to 15 of 24

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Wasilla, Alaska
    Posts
    13,992
    Thanks (Given)
    8494
    Thanks (Received)
    15312
    Likes (Given)
    3307
    Likes (Received)
    3837
    Piss Off (Given)
    27
    Piss Off (Received)
    4
    Mentioned
    201 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475186

    Default

    I have faith that they'll do the right thing.

    It needs to be resolved while there's a common-sense majority seated. Kick the can and this could be addressed with 5 Sotomayor-grade hacks delivering the ruling.
    Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,243
    Thanks (Given)
    34641
    Thanks (Received)
    26705
    Likes (Given)
    2550
    Likes (Received)
    10180
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    374 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475531

    Default

    Lose/lose. The State of NY's argument blows chunks. Why do I need some "non-speculative" reason to prove I need to defend myself? Stupid. I don't need to defend myself until I do Gee, shall I call the defunded NYPD?

    On the other hand, a ruling in favor of the Second Amendment is going to cause the hair-pulling and nail-biting on the left over the "radical Supreme Court" and they'll start their stacking the court rhetoric back up.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Wasilla, Alaska
    Posts
    13,992
    Thanks (Given)
    8494
    Thanks (Received)
    15312
    Likes (Given)
    3307
    Likes (Received)
    3837
    Piss Off (Given)
    27
    Piss Off (Received)
    4
    Mentioned
    201 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    On the other hand, a ruling in favor of the Second Amendment is going to cause the hair-pulling and nail-biting on the left over the "radical Supreme Court"
    Eh... I'm good with that. Looking forward to it, actually!

    and they'll start their stacking the court rhetoric back up.
    They don't have the votes for it. I think we're safe.
    Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,243
    Thanks (Given)
    34641
    Thanks (Received)
    26705
    Likes (Given)
    2550
    Likes (Received)
    10180
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    374 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475531

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NightTrain View Post
    Eh... I'm good with that. Looking forward to it, actually!



    They don't have the votes for it. I think we're safe.
    Not concerned with the votes. Listening to the left and MSM carry on like it's the end of the World is what I get tired of.

    When governments actually come for guns, they do it one at a time. Since no one on the right wants to get together to take a stand an agree on anything, it will be relatively easy. There'll be a few shootouts, and the gun owners will ALWAYS be the outlaws, conspiracy theorists, etc.

    Most will just hand over their weapons like good little sheeple.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    12,859
    Thanks (Given)
    7782
    Thanks (Received)
    7744
    Likes (Given)
    825
    Likes (Received)
    2880
    Piss Off (Given)
    8
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19919862

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Not concerned with the votes. Listening to the left and MSM carry on like it's the end of the World is what I get tired of.

    When governments actually come for guns, they do it one at a time. Since no one on the right wants to get together to take a stand an agree on anything, it will be relatively easy. There'll be a few shootouts, and the gun owners will ALWAYS be the outlaws, conspiracy theorists, etc.

    Most will just hand over their weapons like good little sheeple.
    And domestic terrorists. Don't forget that new one.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,243
    Thanks (Given)
    34641
    Thanks (Received)
    26705
    Likes (Given)
    2550
    Likes (Received)
    10180
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    374 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475531

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Diamond View Post
    And domestic terrorists. Don't forget that new one.
    But of course. They will need a Government-approved label to put on the warrants.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums