I have faith that they'll do the right thing.
It needs to be resolved while there's a common-sense majority seated. Kick the can and this could be addressed with 5 Sotomayor-grade hacks delivering the ruling.
I have faith that they'll do the right thing.
It needs to be resolved while there's a common-sense majority seated. Kick the can and this could be addressed with 5 Sotomayor-grade hacks delivering the ruling.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Lose/lose. The State of NY's argument blows chunks. Why do I need some "non-speculative" reason to prove I need to defend myself? Stupid. I don't need to defend myself until I do Gee, shall I call the defunded NYPD?
On the other hand, a ruling in favor of the Second Amendment is going to cause the hair-pulling and nail-biting on the left over the "radical Supreme Court" and they'll start their stacking the court rhetoric back up.
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke
Not concerned with the votes. Listening to the left and MSM carry on like it's the end of the World is what I get tired of.
When governments actually come for guns, they do it one at a time. Since no one on the right wants to get together to take a stand an agree on anything, it will be relatively easy. There'll be a few shootouts, and the gun owners will ALWAYS be the outlaws, conspiracy theorists, etc.
Most will just hand over their weapons like good little sheeple.
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke