CNN debunks false report about Obama

[Mr. P]

Mis-information already, and from Hillary no less.

Insight Magazine, which is owned by the same company as The Washington Times, reported on its Web site last week that associates of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-New York, had unearthed information the Illinois Democrat and likely presidential candidate attended a Muslim religious school known for teaching the most fundamentalist form of Islam.

Insight attributed the information in its article to an unnamed source, who said it was discovered by "researchers connected to Senator Clinton."

http://www.rawstory.com/showarticle....ssa/index.html

[retiredman]

any independent confirmation of the Clinton connection or are we going with an unnamed source produced by a right wing magazine and treating it as gospel?

pretty convenient.

[dirt mcgirt]

LMAO! See that bubba and neener, the Dems will tear each other apart.

Who said that Hillary would be the first in line to try and rip Obama a new one again?

Answer: ODB and Nate Dawg

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

[neener]

LMAO! See that bubba and neener, the Dems will tear each other apart.

Who said that Hillary would be the first in line to try and rip Obama a new one again?

Answer: ODB and Nate Dawg

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Where did I ever say anything about either hillary or obama or who would be the first to start ripping into him???

If you think i'm a hillary supporter, you need to up your meds.

Fag.

[stephanie]

They'll drop information like this....then just turn around and blame it on the right wing smear machine...

They've got that one down, pat...

[dirt mcgirt]

Where did I ever say anything about either hillary or obama or who would be the first to start ripping into him???

If you think i'm a hillary supporter, you need to up your meds.

Fag.

You said it on another board. Here's what you said:

Neener: Hillary Clinton is the best Presidential candidate in history. Period. If she were in front of me, I'd totally go down on her. We need Hillary in office so I can smoke crack in public and have sex with my goats.

Don't deny it either you sick fag.

[retiredman]

They'll drop information like this....then just turn around and blame it on the right wing smear machine...

They've got that one down, pat...

so.... we ARE just going to take the word of an unnamed source quoted by a right wing publication and treat it as gospel.

why am I not surprised?

[dirt mcgirt]

so.... we ARE just going to take the word of an unnamed source quoted by a right wing publication and treat it as gospel.

why am I not surprised?

LOL. To be fair, there is an article out there from the Washington Post saying that the Clinton attack was fabricated by the Washington Times. But it can't be proven since most liberals don't want journalists to give up their unnamed sources and Hillary can just deny it.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012200260.html

[jillian]

LOL. To be fair, there is an article out there from the Washington Post saying that the Clinton attack was fabricated by the Washington Times. But it can't be proven since most liberals don't want journalists to give up their unnamed sources and Hillary can just deny it.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012200260.html

So the right, in fact, wanted the folk who outed Valerie Plame to divulge their sources, huh?

[neener]

You said it on another board. Here's what you said:

Neener: Hillary Clinton is the best Presidential candidate in history. Period. If she were in front of me, I'd totally go down on her. We need Hillary in office so I can smoke crack in public and have sex with my goats.

Don't deny it either you sick fag.

LOL. I don't need Hillary in office to be able to fuck my goats, I live in Idaho. It's a constitutionally protected right here. Jeez, do your research.

[dirt mcgirt]

So the right, in fact, wanted the folk who outed Valerie Plame to divulge their sources, huh?

It wasn't until they found out that Libby and Rove were involved when the two sides flip-flopped.

But aside from this selective case, most lefties want to protect their sources due to freedom of the press and free speech. No?

Where do you stand on protected sources in the media?

[dirt mcgirt]

LOL. I don't need Hillary in office to be able to fuck my goats, I live in Idaho. It's a constitutionally protected right here. Jeez, do your research.

My bad. But still...you'd like to push your barnyard morals on everyone and want that right extended in every State, sick ass.

[Gaffer]

Unnamed Source? That's the same source the AP always uses to report on events in iraq. Especially the made up reports. Good old Unnamed is the busiest source in the industry. I don't see when he gets time to sleep.

[jillian]

It wasn't until they found out that Libby and Rove were involved when the two sides flip-flopped.

But aside from this selective case, most lefties want to protect their sources due to freedom of the press and free speech. No?

Where do you stand on protected sources in the media?

I actually have mixed feelings about the subject. People give "off the record" information all the time. Otherwise, many wouldn't come forward. But for those types of sources, Watergate would never have been uncovered. On the other hand, when a newspaper reporter does the wrong-doer's bidding, then they should be subject to subpoena. I actually had this discussion with a columnist for the NY Post and she felt that no sources should be dislosed... ever. And last I checked, the Post is pretty right-wing.

[stephanie]

so.... we ARE just going to take the word of an unnamed source quoted by a right wing publication and treat it as gospel.

why am I not surprised?

Why Not! You guys do it all the time...