U.S. Report Says Humans Cause Climate Change

[NightTrain]

As incredibly smart, wise and well informed as you are, a reasonable person would think you'd know more about it.

[pete311]

As incredibly smart, wise and well informed as you are, a reasonable person would think you'd know more about it.

Lots to learn in life. Very complex stuff. I leave most of it to the experts as should you.

[pete311]

Well wait a minute now... didn't you just get done telling Gunny NOT to mix politics with global warming?


I don't know who you think you're fooling, but certainly not me. It's nothing more than your leftist name change game.

GLOBAL WARMING = CLIMATE CHANGE
CLIMATE CHANGE = GLOBAL WARMING

You held your focus groups and dreamt up a new name for GLOBAL WARMING because that name wasn't getting you all anywhere, so you needed to call it something else that wasn't as descriptive, and didn't immediately expose you people for who you are, so botta bing, botta boom, GLOBAL WARMING is now CLIMATE CHANGE, and we all know the climate does change, so who can argue with that... GENIUS.

Sorry... no... you people aren't fooling anyone other than those of you who were buying this snake oil garbage in the first place.

It's not hard. Global warming causes climate change.

[NightTrain]

Lots to learn in life. Very complex stuff. I leave most of it to the experts as should you.

There's your primary problem, Petey.

I think for myself.

At the risk of being ironic, may I invite you to think for yourself?

Skimming moonbat forums for trolling ideas leaves you painted in a box every time you try it because you don't understand the subject matter and are just parroting what some other moonbat commented on with a copy/paste. What was the definition of insanity, again?

[pete311]

There's your primary problem, Petey.

I think for myself.

At the risk of being ironic, may I invite you to think for yourself?

Skimming moonbat forums for trolling ideas leaves you painted in a box every time you try it because you don't understand the subject matter and are just parroting what some other moonbat commented on with a copy/paste. What was the definition of insanity, again?

It's pretty arrogant to think I can be an expert in climate science, economics, mathematics, english, tax law, astrophysics, real estate, civil engineering, brain surgery, AI programming, psychology, etc etc etc. Wow you are impressive to have PhD depth in all areas of life. You don't have to rely on any external information because you know it all and can think your way through everything. Seriously incredible. Congrats! You must be a trillionare because you are a master in the stock market. btw, why did you not retire as a general in service? Didn't you know everything about military strategy and tactics? Don't tell me you had to learn anything from your superiors. Are you telling me they knew things you didn't?

[High_Plains_Drifter]

It's not hard. Global warming causes climate change.

Sorry... but no, don't want to play your games.

Climate change is your new name for global warming, and if it wasn't, you'd all still be calling it global warming. You changed the name for a reason. The same reason you call illegal aliens, undocumented immigrants, and homos, gay, etc. It's what you people do.

But maybe you could explain why the Antarctica ice sheet hasn't declined in the last 100 years, and is in fact growing.

[High_Plains_Drifter]

It's pretty arrogant to think I can be an expert in climate science, economics, mathematics, english, tax law, astrophysics, real estate, civil engineering, brain surgery, AI programming, psychology, etc etc etc. Wow you are impressive to have PhD depth in all areas of life. You don't have to rely on any external information because you know it all and can think your way through everything. Seriously incredible. Congrats! You must be a trillionare because you are a master in the stock market. btw, why did you not retire as a general in service? Didn't you know everything about military strategy and tactics? Don't tell me you had to learn anything from your superiors. Are you telling me they knew things you didn't?

..... wow.

[pete311]

Sorry... but no, don't want to play your games.

Climate change is your new name for global warming, and if it wasn't, you'd all still be calling it global warming. You changed the name for a reason. The same reason you call illegal aliens, undocumented immigrants, and homos, gay, etc. It's what you people do.

But maybe you could explain why the Antarctica ice sheet hasn't declined in the last 100 years, and is in fact growing.

The thread is about the study. Read it, if you have questions, ask them.

[NightTrain]

It's pretty arrogant to think I can be an expert in climate science, economics, mathematics, english, tax law, astrophysics, real estate, civil engineering, brain surgery, AI programming, psychology, etc etc etc. Wow you are impressive to have PhD depth in all areas of life. You don't have to rely on any external information because you know it all and can think your way through everything. Seriously incredible. Congrats! You must be a trillionare because you are a master in the stock market. btw, why did you not retire as a general in service? Didn't you know everything about military strategy and tactics? Don't tell me you had to learn anything from your superiors. Are you telling me they knew things you didn't?

Well, yes, you are very arrogant, Petey. Unjustified, I'm afraid.

You don't have to be an expert and still arrive at the correct conclusion if you're willing to study the subject at hand objectively, something you've endlessly demonstrated that you're incapable of. You have your uninformed opinion and you'll twist & distort in a desperate attempt to justify it - and when we dive in for factual backup, you're lacking every single time. It's very funny.

This is a common shortcoming of moonbats, and why they get wrecked in debates all over the internet daily. They love to do just like you do as I described above in my last post, and it never works out if there is someone halfway intelligent observing the regurgitated nonsense. It certainly doesn't fly around here.

What is the definition of insanity, again?

[pete311]

Well, yes, you are very arrogant, Petey. Unjustified, I'm afraid.

You don't have to be an expert and still arrive at the correct conclusion if you're willing to study the subject at hand objectively, something you've endlessly demonstrated that you're incapable of. You have your uninformed opinion and you'll twist & distort in a desperate attempt to justify it - and when we dive in for factual backup, you're lacking every single time. It's very funny.

This is a common shortcoming of moonbats, and why they get wrecked in debates all over the internet daily. They love to do just like you do as I described above in my last post, and it never works out if there is someone halfway intelligent observing the regurgitated nonsense. It certainly doesn't fly around here.

What is the definition of insanity, again?

Impressive that you are smarter than hundreds of trump admin climate scientists. Well done! I'm out to lunch. peace

[High_Plains_Drifter]

The thread is about the study. Read it, if you have questions, ask them.

"Study?" The thread title says it's about humans causing global warming, so I asked you a question pertaining to global warming, and now you want to talk about studying... hmmm...

[pete311]

"Study?" The thread says it's about humans causing global warming, so I asked you a question pertaining to global warming, and now you want to talk about studying... hmmm...

https://science2017.globalchange.gov/

[High_Plains_Drifter]

https://science2017.globalchange.gov/

So, you don't know... OK... you could have just said so.

[pete311]

So, you don't know... OK... you could have just said so.

I'm not a climatologist, go find one, and ask them. This thread is a discussion about the study I just linked you.

[High_Plains_Drifter]

I'm not a climatologist, go find one, and ask them. This thread is a discussion about the study I just linked you.

So right off the bat this "study" indicates "loss of ice," but yet I asked you if you could explain how the ice pack in Antarctica has grown, and you can't answer that.

That's all. How does the Antarctic ice pack grow if the planet is warming?

Or is the "study" more fake science and lying about the numbers?