2 Billion Years Unchanged, Bacteria Pose an Evolutionary Puzzle

[revelarts]

evolution does not arise from need anyway, it's a passive process. sometimes the mutations help, sometimes they hurt. ....

SO Pete ,lets assume you are right,
you're saying "evolution does not arise from need anyway, it's a passive process." meaning it just happens.
so to find a "2 billion" year old bacteria IS odd by your evolutionary standards, even if the environment hasn't changed since evolution is "PASSIVE". the environment is NOT the main or only factor. You seem to be saying there should have been some evolution -helpful or harmful- over 2 billion years.

However the scientist who made the discovery say YOU are wrong, that Darwin "predicts"() that some things DO NOT CHANGE AT ALL if the environment doesn't change. That enviro pressures are the key evolutionary factor. But scientist looking at the lake in Antarctica say you're right and predicted based on Darwin's theory that mutations should occur in a stable closed environment.

so which is it?
If it's Both then it predicts NOTHING because it predicts EVERYTHING.

---Evolution happens you fools, look that thing changed slightly that's hard evidence of major change!!!
and look here that thing didn't change at all over billions of years that proves evolution too you fools!!!---

yeah ok, the Sun came up today that'sevidence for evolution too i guess.
But if evolution is not falsifiable then it's not a serious scientific theory, it's just a tautology proving everything, full of 'just so stories'.