9th Circus Court to rule on Calif prop 8 - change fundamental definition of marriage

[logroller]

In order for queers to be protected under any equal rights or protection clauses it musr first be determined that they are born that way and not that way by choice...............that has yet to happen.

By default they are not a minority and not subject to those protections.

That doesn't make any sense at all.

I have the right to vote, and I must register in order to do so; I registered as a Republican, hence I have a right to vote in the republican primary; need I provide evidence i was born that way, pass some demonstrative test???
How bout someone who's born deaf and mute; are they not afforded a right to free speech; after all, they're not born that way?

I get it; you hold contempt for equality, and you have a right to do so; but can you prove to me you were born that way?

[OCA]

That doesn't make any sense at all.

I have the right to vote, and I must register in order to do so; I registered as a Republican, hence I have a right to vote in the republican primary; need I provide evidence i was born that way, pass some demonstrative test???
How bout someone who's born deaf and mute; are they not afforded a right to free speech; after all, they're not born that way?

I get it; you hold contempt for equality, and you have a right to do so; but can you prove to me you were born that way?

Apples and oranges....political affiliation vs being a queer.................lol.

[OCA]

You guys make some of the silliest arguments ever..............I just asked a random 8 year old if two guys being married is ok. Answer? "heck no!"

Even 8 yr olds comprehend simple right and wrongs.

[logroller]

Apples and oranges....political affiliation vs being a queer.................lol.

Rights are rights, not apples. You can dismiss whatever keeps your ignorant self content-- thankfully, our system of government doesn't operate under such fallacious logic.

You guys make some of the silliest arguments ever..............I just asked a random 8 year old if two guys being married is ok. Answer? "heck no!"

Even 8 yr olds comprehend simple right and wrongs.

Resting your laurels on a child's reasoning, why am I not surprised.
Well my two year old thinks shitting his pants is OK....which reminds me of your arguments.

[OCA]

Rights are rights, not apples. You can dismiss whatever keeps your ignorant self content-- thankfully, our system of government doesn't operate under such fallacious logic.



Resting your laurels on a child's reasoning, why am I not surprised.
Well my two year old thinks shitting his pants is OK....which reminds me of your arguments.

Oh lord, its time for the Wiggles I guess.

Answer this question kid: do you believe that its normal or natural for two men or two women to bugger each other and be married?

[Missileman]

Oh lord, its time for the Wiggles I guess.

Answer this question kid: do you believe that its normal or natural for two men or two women to bugger each other and be married?

There's nothing natural about marriage.

[OCA]

There's nothing natural about marriage.

Sure there is Mr. Elton John.

[logroller]

Oh lord, its time for the Wiggles I guess.

Answer this question kid: do you believe that its normal or natural for two men or two women to bugger each other and be married?

Wiggles? Never seen it. I'll tell you what's normal is for an adult act like one. Save your condescension for somebody who's less mature than yourself; perhaps while kissing their boo boos.

[OCA]

Wiggles? Never seen it. I'll tell you what's normal is for an adult act like one. Save your condescension for somebody who's less mature than yourself; perhaps while kissing their boo boos.

I love it when they get flustered.

[ConHog]

Sure there is Mr. Elton John.

]f it were natural , then EVERYONE would be married. Eating and urinating for example are natural and hence EVERYONE does it.

[Missileman]

]f it were natural , then EVERYONE would be married. Eating and urinating for example are natural and hence EVERYONE does it.

Though mating for life occurs in a few species, it is not human nature.

[ConHog]

Though mating for life occurs in a few species, it is not human nature.

Of course my belief is that originally it WAS human nature, but that nature was changed with the introduction of sin.

[jimnyc]

]f it were natural , then EVERYONE would be married. Eating and urinating for example are natural and hence EVERYONE does it.

Natural = everyone according to that post. You're only supporting OCA with a comment like that, unless of course you believe EVERYONE takes part in gay sex.

[ConHog]

Natural = everyone according to that post. You're only supporting OCA with a comment like that, unless of course you believe EVERYONE takes part in gay sex.

Why do you say that Jim? I contend that sex in general is natural, but marriage is not. And yes, I realize that not everyone actually HAS sex, but my belief is everyone would like to.

[Missileman]

Of course my belief is that originally it WAS human nature, but that nature was changed with the introduction of sin.

That would also necessitate the belief that Adam had no choice as Eve was the only game in town, NO?