States need to start their own volunteer militia's!!

[red states rule]

[cadet]

https://unitedstatesmilitia.com/foru...ead.php?t=9553

Matthew Davis sent the email moments after the Supreme Court ruling to numerous new media outlets and limited government activists with the headline: “Is Armed Rebellion Now Justified?”

He stressed that he wasn't calling for armed rebellion but added his own personal note to the email, saying, “… here’s my response. And yes, I mean it.”

He said he was writing with an "eye toward asking at what point the Republic is in peril."

“There are times government has to do things to get what it wants and holds a gun to your head," Davis said. "I’m saying at some point, we have to ask the question when do we turn that gun around and say no and resist.

"Was the American Revolution justified?”

Davis said the key word was “justified,” adding that a peaceful resolution toward changing the law is the goal. He said rebellion often is the end result of people who get backed against a wall and wondered when that might occur when it comes to the Obamacare ruling.

"If government can mandate that I pay for something I don't want, then what is beyond its power?" he wrote. "If the Supreme Court's decision Thursday paves the way for unprecedented intrusion into personal decisions, than has the Republic all but ceased to exist? If so, then is armed rebellion today justified? God willing, this oppression will be lifted and America free again before the first shot is fired."

Davis said he wasn't calling for violence, rather he was pointing out that historically that is what has occurred at times in America. He compared armed rebellion to a situation where the government cannot get your money by way of liens or seizure of bank accounts is coming to arrest you for not paying an unconstitutional tax.

“You can’t have people walking with lattes and signs and think the object of your opposition is going to take you seriously,” Davis said. “Armed rebellion is the end point of that physical confrontation.”

Here’s his email:

Is Armed Rebellion Now Justified?

Implicit in Benjamin Franklin's fabled response at the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention was a dire warning: That the Republic would one day devolve into tyranny unless we the people prevented it.

In 2008, we the people elected Barack Obama as president, and the 100-year progressive trek to tyranny begun in 1912 with Woodrow Wilson's election was complete. It cannot be said too many times — for the purposes of emphasis and clarity — that the Constitution was possible ONLY AFTER the American Revolution; and that the war itself would not have been possible without the collective agreement, as so eloquently articulated in the Declaration of Independence, that the course of human events will sometimes justify one group of people to sever themselves from their oppressors.

In other words, America itself was possible only after its people summoned the will to risk their lives and their futures — as well as those of their children — for a freedom they did not enjoy but knew was their gift from God. Along with their desire to be free came their willingness to engaged in armed rebellion for their freedom.

If government can mandate that I pay for something I don't want, then what is beyond its power? If the Supreme Court's decision Thursday paves the way for unprecedented intrusion into personal decisions, then has the Republic all but ceased to exist? If so, then is armed rebellion today justified?

God willing, this oppression will be lifted and America free again before the first shot is fired.


Continued.
http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/17151

This guy, I like this guy. Very peaceful threat.

[red states rule]

[fj1200]

Matthew Davis sent the email moments after the Supreme Court ruling to numerous new media outlets and limited government activists with the headline: “Is Armed Rebellion Now Justified?”

Against whom shall we take up arms?

[tailfins]

Against whom shall we take up arms?

How about recapturing Fort Sumter?

[ConHog]

Against whom shall we take up arms?

anyone who they can blame for their woes.

Crops died out? Libs fault
Lost your job? Libs fault
Creek ran dry? Libs fault

answer ? Rebel against the man.

[logroller]

How about recapturing Fort Sumter?

...from the park service? Down with the docents!!!

[ConHog]

...from the park service? Down with the docents!!!

would be an easy victory. Just distract them with a picnic basket snatching bear and the park is yours




The South will rise again!!!!!

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Against whom shall we take up arms?

Those destroying the authority of the Constitution. Those destroying our freedoms. Those that would enslave us and deny us even our basic rights.
Thanks for posting on topic.
State militia's will be required to protect state rights and individual citizen rights. Its coming down to that because the huge Federal government has now decided that Executive Orders are preferred over and better than Congressional actions (used to be called laws).. Now we are being acclimated to obama decrees, otherwise known as Executive Orders. Dictatorial decrees by a fancy name are still dictatorial. -Tyr

[ConHog]

Those destroying the authority of the Constitution. Those destroying our freedoms. Those that would enslave us and deny us even our basic rights.
Thanks for posting on topic.
State militia's will be required to protect state rights and individual citizen rights. Its coming down to that because the huge Federal government has now decided that Executive Orders are preferred over and better than Congressional actions (used to be called laws).. Now we are being acclimated to obama decrees, otherwise known as Executive Orders. Dictatorial decrees by a fancy name are still dictatorial. -Tyr

no one is destroying anything. You and others are having a hissy fit that you lost an election. Nothing more.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

no one is destroying anything. You and others are having a hissy fit that you lost an election. Nothing more.

Keep on revealing your support for obama. And this thread is about State militia's do we need to have them solely under state authority. Its not about the election or election results. Its about American citizens seizing the chance to try to save their freedoms and basic rights. -Tyr

[ConHog]

Keep on revealing your support for obama. And this thread is about State militia's do we need to have them solely under state authority. Its not about the election or election results. Its about American citizens seizing the chance to try to save their freedoms and basic rights. -Tyr

Please show where I have supported Obama or admit you lied

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Please show where I have supported Obama or admit you lied

right here, go ahead and deny..

ConHog

Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
Those destroying the authority of the Constitution. Those destroying our freedoms. Those that would enslave us and deny us even our basic rights.
Thanks for posting on topic.
State militia's will be required to protect state rights and individual citizen rights. Its coming down to that because the huge Federal government has now decided that Executive Orders are preferred over and better than Congressional actions (used to be called laws).. Now we are being acclimated to obama decrees, otherwise known as Executive Orders. Dictatorial decrees by a fancy name are still dictatorial. -Tyr



no one is destroying anything. You and others are having a hissy fit that you lost an election. Nothing more.

If saying obama isn't destroying anything is not defending him then birds don't have feathers!!!!

And thats just the one I grabbed from this thread.. --Tyr

[ConHog]

right here, go ahead and deny..





If saying obama isn't destroying anything is not defending him then birds don't have feathers!!!!

And thats just the one I grabbed from this thread.. --Tyr

Failing to agree with you that someone is destroying the nation is NOT defending that person Tyr.

Proof denied.

[fj1200]

Those destroying the authority of the Constitution. Those destroying our freedoms. Those that would enslave us and deny us even our basic rights.
Thanks for posting on topic.
State militia's will be required to protect state rights and individual citizen rights. Its coming down to that because the huge Federal government has now decided that Executive Orders are preferred over and better than Congressional actions (used to be called laws).. Now we are being acclimated to obama decrees, otherwise known as Executive Orders. Dictatorial decrees by a fancy name are still dictatorial. -Tyr

Could you point them out to me?

BTW, EOs have been issued for a couple of hundred years now... but that's not new information now is it.