West Point men become first to marry at academy

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Um, no. It looks like you dropped the necrophilia meme... unless that one was wrapped up in "etc." My definition of liberty is freedom from someone else using government to further their agenda. Besides, there is never "complete liberty" so I reject your strawman.



What consequences do they want removed? And right, the State is not free to destroy your beliefs.

The consequence that others will publicly and privately disapprove of their perversion. That's too bad, they haven't made the man or men that can force me to destroy my own principles. All it takes is to be wiling to die for what one believes. No big deal we all got to go sometime, I rather prefer it be in defense of the morals and principles I have. You could say that I have faith in the accuracy and goodness of both. Why should I give a damn what butt banging scum and their ally liberal government tell me to do?? If that presents that I should have to stand alone against them all , fine with me,.. A man takes a stand and tells such scum and the government to both get ffkk'ed. --Tyr

[fj1200]

Sorry we can't accommodate every sexual Deviancy with new Laws and Traditions, and unfortunately that includes your personal preference as well, I fell your desperation, but look don't hurt your self, trying to understand, its far to simple for the Liberal Mind.

Do you get a headache every time you stick it in the sand?

I see we have another "conservative" with an active imagination. Simple minded indeed, can't have that darn Constitution get in the way of some being more equal than others.

[fj1200]

The consequence that others will publicly and privately disapprove of their perversion.

So you DO want the State to preference you over someone else...

[Larrymc]

Do you get a headache every time you stick it in the sand?

can't have that darn Constitution get in the way of some being more equal than others. 

Thank you, you may have finale got it, No reason Sexual Deviants should have special Laws and Traditions made just to suit them.

[fj1200]

can't have that darn Constitution get in the way of some being more equal than others. 

Thank you, you may have finale got it, No reason Sexual Deviants should have special Laws and Traditions made just to suit them.

What is it like to have given up completely? Or do you not understand equal protection, i.e. no special laws? And in case you misinterpreted that was you, and me for that matter, being "more equal."

[Larrymc]

What is it like to have given up completely? Or do you not understand equal protection, i.e. no special laws? And in case you misinterpreted that was you, and me for that matter, being "more equal."

You can call Equality if you like. but it don't change the fact that no other sexual Deviancy has or is asking for special treatment and consideration solely on a Sexual Deviancy. "YET" I know the argument is born that way, making you a different class such as race, but there is absolutely no prof of that, which has already been discussed on here. I think the American People have been Patient, Tolerant, understanding, and Accepting, but you will not stop until perversion is the norm instead of traditional relationships, My hope is that you will continue to push until Decent People get enough and force you back in the closet, Seems simple, unless like you, are of a Liberal Mind

[fj1200]

What is it like to have given up completely?

You can call Equality if you like. but it don't change the fact that no other sexual Deviancy has or is asking for special treatment and consideration solely on a Sexual Deviancy. ... My hope is that you will continue to push until Decent People get enough and force you back in the closet, Seems simple, unless like you, are of a Liberal Mind

So it gives you a warm fuzzy feeling? That's cool. What special treatment do they want?

[jimnyc]

What special treatment do they want?

Acceptance via legislation. And don't reply to me, fucker, as it's way too early for me to be debating today.

[Larrymc]

So it gives you a warm fuzzy feeling? That's cool. What special treatment do they want?

This is getting old, it has been explained as simple as possible, They want to be recognized as another class of people, at best they are a group of people who share a particular Sexual desire, Hardly making another Race or Ethnicity, Infidelity could be argued born that way, should we be offering Marital benefits to all Mistresses, and Booty Calls. I suppose it could fall under Polygamy, Ooops that's against the law. Let me warn once again don"t hurt your self, trying to understand, Play it safe and stick to your equality for all the perverted stance

[Arbo]

Acceptance via legislation.

I don't think they give a shit about you or any other member of the westboro baptists accepting them. Since other WB members have driven this back to sex again and again, let me remind all of you, it's about two adults that want to commit to each other for life and have the same 'benefits' in terms of taxes, visitation in hospitals, etc.

For some reason you WB's keep going to butt sex. It's a strange obsession.

[Larrymc]

I don't think they give a shit about you or any other member of the westboro baptists accepting them. Since other WB members have driven this back to sex again and again, let me remind all of you, it's about two adults that want to commit to each other for life and have the same 'benefits' in terms of taxes, visitation in hospitals, etc.

For some reason you WB's keep going to butt sex. It's a strange obsession.

Civil Unions, offered all the above, and with little resistance, But that's not the real agenda, You Faggots intend to push until its the Norm, Rather than Traditional Relationships,

[Arbo]

Civil Unions, offered all the above, and with little resistance, But that's not the real agenda, You Faggots intend to push until its the Norm, Rather than Traditional Relationships,

Civil Unions in a state do not match up with marriage benefits that are at a federal level. 1 != 2. Thanks for showing your westboro baptist colors.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

So you DO want the State to preference you over someone else...

Really? So if I do not conform to the new principles the state has on moral issues then I am asking for special treatment? If I know the state has no right and no authority to try its best to force me to change my moral judgment (by various means) then I am in the wrong? I am sorry but Hoss it doesn't work that way. If I will not let any man force me to go against my own principles why would I let the State do it? I'd rather continue being the Red Oak tree( Quercus rubra ) my friend. Let others be the weeping pussy willow tree (Salix caprea). Methinks you value and think too highly of the perfection of the State. The State is not perfect and I reject its attacks upon myself and my family's principles. I am just the type of guy the State always destroys to push its way. Do you think my knowing that will stop me or force me to abandon my principles? --Tyr

[Larrymc]

Civil Unions in a state do not match up with marriage benefits that are at a federal level. 1 != 2. Thanks for showing your westboro baptist colors.

Civil Unions would have gave you every thing, except Marriage,but would have had no problem getting other benefits desired added to a Union, but as i said that's not the real agenda. Religious Extremist, which is what you decided to label me and others with in your WB comment, i thought it fitting to remind you there are labels other than Gay for you, if you want to go there,

[jimnyc]

I don't think they give a shit about you or any other member of the westboro baptists accepting them. Since other WB members have driven this back to sex again and again, let me remind all of you, it's about two adults that want to commit to each other for life and have the same 'benefits' in terms of taxes, visitation in hospitals, etc.

For some reason you WB's keep going to butt sex. It's a strange obsession.

Huh? Where did this come from? Are you saying I'm a member of the Westboro church nitwits, or like them? I think the entire board would agree that those people are nutty as can possibly be. Why do you want to make such a comparison, based on one stance, when they are reprehensible on endless stances? It seems that label is solely to insult. And why claim we or me are obsessed? You got that from a post of mine to FJ, which was tongue somewhat in cheek? Why grab something I replied to FJ about and try to insult from it?