Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    a place called, Liberty
    Posts
    9,922
    Thanks (Given)
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    314
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    441564

    Default Jack Murtha: The Britney Spears of Congress

    Oh my...There's a picture of Murtha at their site.......View at your own risk....

    February 20, 2007
    Vox Populi, Current Events, War, Politics
    By Warner Todd Huston

    The worst thing about pop culture celebrities is their ever downwardly spiraling behavior. To get noticed they feel they must indulge in ever more outrageous behavior until they end up dead like Anna Nichol Smith or a drunken, debauched mess like the empty-headed Britney Spears. Sadly, the media and the gossip rags eat it up.

    This pathology to attention mongering isn’t, though, exclusive to these so-called celebrities. In fact, such “notice” can sing a siren song for politicians, too. Especially those who imagine themselves populists.

    It isn’t enough to have a principle and fight for it. That “principle” must be expanded ever more and the targets that the principle is applied against must be ever more extreme. Jack Murtha fits this political definition to a tee.

    Jack Murtha is the Britney Spears of Congress. And his anti-war stance is the avenue to his pathological need to be noticed. And he isn’t alone.

    This weekend, the House of Representatives passed a non-binding denouncement of president Bush’s “surge” plans in Iraq. Showing how simple minded the House leadership is, Speaker Pelosi was proud to say that they had created a “new direction” in Iraq in a resolution that had “fewer than 100 words” contained in it.

    Still, it is Murtha who seems to be spiraling ever more extreme on the issue.

    With his oversight panel on military spending Murtha plans to put so many requirements on the budget that it will be impossible to implement properly. And it is obvious he couldn’t care less how it will affect the troops. It is being called the “slow bleed” plan.

    “They won’t have the equipment, they don’t have the training and they won’t be able to do the work. There’s no question in my mind”, Murtha is quoted as having said.

    But that is nothing compared to the news that he was going to appear at a Moveon.org function, the radical and far left organization funded by illegal drug activist George Sorros.

    Caught by a new website called The Victory Caucus, the Moveon.org advertisement read as follows:

    Coming Tomorrow!!

    CHAIRMAN JACK MURTHA TO OUTLINE COMMITTEE STRATEGY ON BUSH’S IRAQ FUNDING REQUEST THURSDAY MORNING AT 11:00 AM EST ON MOVECONGRESS.ORG

    Join Us!

    Join us tomorrow at 11:00 AM EST when Congressman Jack Murtha will outline new details of a strategy to use his Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense to oppose the Bush war in Iraq. Congressman Jim Moran, another Committee member, predicts the Committee action will be the “bite” that follows this week’s Congressional “bark” – the three-day debate on a non-binding Congressional resolution.

    The Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense has begun consideration of the president’s $93 billion supplemental appropriations request for Iraq. Action on the request will be the first opportunity for the new Congress to exercise its “power-of-the-purse” over the Iraq war.

    Chairman Murtha will describe his strategy for not only limiting the deployment of troops to Iraq but undermining other aspects of the president’s foreign and national security policy. Chairman Murtha discusses these steps in a videotaped conversation with former Congressman Tom Andrews (D-ME), the National Director of the Win Without War coalition, sponsor of MoveCongress.org.

    Join us here tomorrow for this exclusive interview.

    Naturally, once the conservative website highlighted this outrageous message, Moveon.org cleaned up their verbiage later that day and the bit I emphasized above mysteriously disappeared.

    Mike Duncan, RNC Chairman, had it perfectly right when he brought Murtha’s “slow-bleed” plan, his next step in extremism, to the fore.

    We’ve known all along that they want to cut and run before the job is done. But they’ve been afraid to confront President Bush directly. Today, Democrat Rep. Jack Murtha let slip what he and Nancy Pelosi really intend to do, and it is genuinely frightening.

    Murtha has steadily increased his extreme anti-war and anti-Bush rhetoric since the day a fawning MSM brought this long unknown pol to national prominence.

    He obviously craves the spotlight, but the only way he can stay in the news is to become ever more wild-eyed with his rants and ever more hateful in his actions and policy discussions.

    Murtha is truly the Britney Spears of Congress. He is just as empty headed and just as self-destructive. Unfortunately, his personal debauchery doesn’t merely harm himself and bemuse the paparazzi. It affects US policy and harms our troops who are already doing dangerous enough work.

    As Duncan reminds us, “Our armed forces are the best in the world. They are serving with tremendous honor and bravery in Iraq. We cannot gradually abandon them. We cannot allow the Murtha-Pelosi ’slow-bleed’ plan to happen.”

    We must stop Moveon.org and Jack Murtha from further hurting our troops, our policies, and our safety.
    http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/02/20/...s-of-congress/
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
    Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    O-hi-o
    Posts
    12,192
    Thanks (Given)
    8017
    Thanks (Received)
    1650
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    7
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3656130

    Default

    This is why I say murtha is a traitor.

    Would love the opportunity to say that to his face. I think that man is even lower than kerry. He's getting a name for himself alright. Scum Sucking Bastard.
    When I die I'm sure to go to heaven, cause I spent my time in hell.

    You get more with a kind word and a two by four, than you do with just a kind word.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    a place called, Liberty
    Posts
    9,922
    Thanks (Given)
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    314
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    441564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaffer View Post
    This is why I say murtha is a traitor.

    Would love the opportunity to say that to his face. I think that man is even lower than kerry. He's getting a name for himself alright. Scum Sucking Bastard.

    I feel the same about both, Murtha and Kerry........Tratiors
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
    Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,417
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    546

    Default Murtha a traitor?

    I dunno there, guys...

    From what I can see, Jack Murtha is a stand-up guy.

    Didn't he do a couple of tours in 'Nam with his Marine unit?

    Are you calling him a traitor because he dared to question administration policy in Iraq?

    Isn't that why his constituents elected him?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Thunder Road
    Posts
    1,104
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW in Ohio View Post
    I dunno there, guys...

    From what I can see, Jack Murtha is a stand-up guy.

    Didn't he do a couple of tours in 'Nam with his Marine unit?

    Are you calling him a traitor because he dared to question administration policy in Iraq?

    Isn't that why his constituents elected him?
    Yep.

    Yep.

    Yep.

    Yep.

    Not to mention the fact that before he turned against the war, he was the neo-cons' pet dem (well, him and Lieberman). Thing is, I'm told the reason he started publicly opposing the way the war was being handled was because of his contacts in the Pentagon (and he had and has A LOT) practically begging him to take on Rumsfeld.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    7,727
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    243663

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jillian View Post
    Yep.

    Yep.

    Yep.

    Yep.

    Not to mention the fact that before he turned against the war, he was the neo-cons' pet dem (well, him and Lieberman). Thing is, I'm told the reason he started publicly opposing the way the war was being handled was because of his contacts in the Pentagon (and he had and has A LOT) practically begging him to take on Rumsfeld.
    Why did they want him to "take on" Rummy?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW in Ohio View Post
    I dunno there, guys...

    From what I can see, Jack Murtha is a stand-up guy.

    Didn't he do a couple of tours in 'Nam with his Marine unit?

    Are you calling him a traitor because he dared to question administration policy in Iraq?

    Isn't that why his constituents elected him?
    No I think we are calling him a traitor because he is trying to secretly defund the troops so more of them are killed to the point where the American people demand the President pull out of Iraq. If that isnt treason. I dont know what is.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,417
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    546

    Default

    No one is going to cut off funding for our troops to the point where they are in danger. It takes some gutsy people like Murtha to stand up to this administration and tell them they're wrong.

    If anyone is responsible for the 3,000 deaths and thousands more wounded among our troops in Iraq, it is George Bush, and Rumsfeld, and Cheney and the rest of that arrogant, stupid neocon gang that thought they would knock off Hussein and then everything would be cool in Iraq.

    I do not expect Bush & co. to answer in this life for those deaths and war injuries, but I expect they'll answer in the next life.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,853
    Thanks (Given)
    960
    Thanks (Received)
    3749
    Likes (Given)
    535
    Likes (Received)
    854
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17759695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW in Ohio View Post
    No one is going to cut off funding for our troops to the point where they are in danger. It takes some gutsy people like Murtha to stand up to this administration and tell them they're wrong.

    Not so sure just how gutsy Murtha is and I sure as hell don't trust ANY politician not to cut funding to the point troops are in danger. The history of this country shows time and again just how badly our military funding can be cut to the detriment of the troops.

    If anyone is responsible for the 3,000 deaths and thousands more wounded among our troops in Iraq, it is George Bush, and Rumsfeld, and Cheney and the rest of that arrogant, stupid neocon gang that thought they would knock off Hussein and then everything would be cool in Iraq.

    Naw, I think it the lowlife bastards who are making the bombs and blowing things up are responsible for the dead and wounded.

    I do not expect Bush & co. to answer in this life for those deaths and war injuries, but I expect they'll answer in the next life.

    And I expect the same for those who REALLY did the killing and wounded. I suspect God does not base his judgements on ones political affiliation.
    Funding has been cut to those levels you mention many many times in this country. As for the rest of your rhetoric, obviously I disagree.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,417
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    546

    Default

    CSM: It's a given that there are murderous assholes in the Middle East who think that blowing up women and children will earn them favor with Allah.

    For an American president to put our people among those murderous assholes for no good reason is a very, very bad thing.

    Bush and Rummy and Cheney and the rest will pay for every one of our American casualties, not (as I said earlier) in this life, but in the next.

    The wheel of karma grinds slowly, but inexorably.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    a place called, Liberty
    Posts
    9,922
    Thanks (Given)
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    314
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    441564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW in Ohio View Post
    No one is going to cut off funding for our troops to the point where they are in danger. It takes some gutsy people like Murtha to stand up to this administration and tell them they're wrong.

    If anyone is responsible for the 3,000 deaths and thousands more wounded among our troops in Iraq, it is George Bush, and Rumsfeld, and Cheney and the rest of that arrogant, stupid neocon gang that thought they would knock off Hussein and then everything would be cool in Iraq.

    I do not expect Bush & co. to answer in this life for those deaths and war injuries, but I expect they'll answer in the next life.
    Yep......It's as simple as that......

    Let's all those men from the civil war, Koren war, ww1, ww2, gulf war 1,

    Now lets let all those men and women from the Iraq war.......

    Let all them accuse their President of putting our soldiers in harms way, for a misguided war........

    Because to you all.......All their lives were wasted.....



    You all make me sick....
    Last edited by stephanie; 02-21-2007 at 09:04 AM.
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
    Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC)

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,853
    Thanks (Given)
    960
    Thanks (Received)
    3749
    Likes (Given)
    535
    Likes (Received)
    854
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17759695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW in Ohio View Post
    CSM: It's a given that there are murderous assholes in the Middle East who think that blowing up women and children will earn them favor with Allah.

    For an American president to put our people among those murderous assholes for no good reason is a very, very bad thing.

    Well, ignoring them worked reall well, didn't it!

    Bush and Rummy and Cheney and the rest will pay for every one of our American casualties, not (as I said earlier) in this life, but in the next.

    Hey, while your busy handing out supreme justice, I have a list that I need taken care off. Trust me, these folks all need to burn in hell.

    The wheel of karma grinds slowly, but inexorably.

    Yes it does!
    Again, we obviously disagree.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,417
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    546

    Default

    CSM: I believe that most of the people in the Middle East are basically crazy. I don't know if it's their religion that makes them crazy, or the climate of the region, of if they're just irredeemable stupid assholes.

    In any case, these people have a lot of issues to work out with one another....Sunnis vs. Shiites.....Arabs vs. non-Arabs......moderates vs. radicals, etc.......

    I would like to see us to follow a foreign policy that disengages us from the region. Let them sort out their own shit. They'll kill one another if we're not around.

    But as a corollary to this foreign policy, I'd make it clear to the whole world that any attack on American soil will bring instant retaliation and the motherfuckers and their families who killed Americans will wish they were never born.

    That's the foreign policy I support.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,853
    Thanks (Given)
    960
    Thanks (Received)
    3749
    Likes (Given)
    535
    Likes (Received)
    854
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17759695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW in Ohio View Post
    CSM: I believe that most of the people in the Middle East are basically crazy. I don't know if it's their religion that makes them crazy, or the climate of the region, of if they're just irredeemable stupid assholes.

    In any case, these people have a lot of issues to work out with one another....Sunnis vs. Shiites.....Arabs vs. non-Arabs......moderates vs. radicals, etc.......

    I would like to see us to follow a foreign policy that disengages us from the region. Let them sort out their own shit. They'll kill one another if we're not around.

    But as a corollary to this foreign policy, I'd make it clear to the whole world that any attack on American soil will bring instant retaliation and the motherfuckers and their families who killed Americans will wish they were never born.

    That's the foreign policy I support.
    I can wholeheartedly support that position. Your corollary is especially intriguing in that is exactly how I view the ongoing operations in Iraq. Debates about Hussien/Al Quaeda notwithstanding, I believe the war on terrorism is truly a war against Islamic extremists and not just Al Quaeda or Hussein or the Taliban. Iraq provides a very strategically sound venue for doing that.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW in Ohio View Post
    No one is going to cut off funding for our troops to the point where they are in danger. It takes some gutsy people like Murtha to stand up to this administration and tell them they're wrong.

    Um hello!? That is EXACTLY what Murtha is doing. He has SAID that's what he is doing. To deny act as though He didn't say it when we have audio tape of him saying it is either Naive or just an example of putting ones head in the sand.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums