manfrommaine: I've followed your career here and I've been very impressed by the way you have been able to keep the discussion on a civil, informed level even while some individuals on the right engaged in insults and name calling.
Far from being disappointed in you, I'm impressed that you've been able to hold to the high road for so long. It's not easy when those who oppose you ideologically have little to offer but insults and venom, but I urge you to keep bringing the discussions back to a civil level and not get dragged down into pettiness.
You've done a much better job of keeping to the high road than I have.
Someone pass the barf bag
No comment of the messiah being embarrassed by his country GW. Or do you agree with your messiah?
Once again here is the messiah in his own words
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Jy_QOm2sbQ&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Jy_QOm2sbQ&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
red states: My impression is that Obama is trying to get Americans to look beyond narrow, parochial interests and take a global view. In other words, he's trying to get us to ask, not "What is good for the US" but rather, "What is good for the planet?"
I feel strongly that we have to take that kind of global view because we are faced with problems that affect the entire planet. (Global warming is one of these problems, but so is international terrorism.)