Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 256
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    49,579
    Thanks (Given)
    36105
    Thanks (Received)
    27789
    Likes (Given)
    3460
    Likes (Received)
    11179
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475548

    Default To Catch a Predator

    First off, I think Chris Hanson is one of the smarmiest, self-sanctimonious asshats I've ever seen. Second, apparently, because I offended one certain chump who participates in the entrapment activities that he chose to destroy a message board in his unbridled hatred of my opposition. How's THAT for having power over someone?

    For those not in the know, the premise of the show is that an internet group pretends to be 13-15 years olds and lures grown men to a specific address where they are exposed on camera (for later use by MSNBC), then hammered by cops once they try to leave.

    Let's see if we can differentiate between Gunny's opinion here:

    1. I'd as soon shoot a child molester as look at one. Matter of fact, I'd rather kick their asses ... more painful than a shooting.

    2. However, I believe going onto the internet and posing as an under-age person and luring someone into a trap where they are arrested is entrapment. Originally, the police were not involved and the person(s) were just exposed. No problem.

    However, I believe once you involve law enforcement, you cross the legal (not moral) line.

    Tell me where I'm wrong (and not YOU ConHog -- you don't know shit).
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,799
    Thanks (Given)
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    59
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    835974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    First off, I think Chris Hanson is one of the smarmiest, self-sanctimonious asshats I've ever seen. Second, apparently, because I offended one certain chump who participates in the entrapment activities that he chose to destroy a message board in his unbridled hatred of my opposition. How's THAT for having power over someone?

    For those not in the know, the premise of the show is that an internet group pretends to be 13-15 years olds and lures grown men to a specific address where they are exposed on camera (for later use by MSNBC), then hammered by cops once they try to leave.

    Let's see if we can differentiate between Gunny's opinion here:

    1. I'd as soon shoot a child molester as look at one. Matter of fact, I'd rather kick their asses ... more painful than a shooting.

    2. However, I believe going onto the internet and posing as an under-age person and luring someone into a trap where they are arrested is entrapment. Originally, the police were not involved and the person(s) were just exposed. No problem.

    However, I believe once you involve law enforcement, you cross the legal (not moral) line.

    Tell me where I'm wrong (and not YOU ConHog -- you don't know shit).
    Whoa! Deja Vu

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    First off, I think Chris Hanson is one of the smarmiest, self-sanctimonious asshats I've ever seen. Second, apparently, because I offended one certain chump who participates in the entrapment activities that he chose to destroy a message board in his unbridled hatred of my opposition. How's THAT for having power over someone?

    For those not in the know, the premise of the show is that an internet group pretends to be 13-15 years olds and lures grown men to a specific address where they are exposed on camera (for later use by MSNBC), then hammered by cops once they try to leave.

    Let's see if we can differentiate between Gunny's opinion here:

    1. I'd as soon shoot a child molester as look at one. Matter of fact, I'd rather kick their asses ... more painful than a shooting.

    2. However, I believe going onto the internet and posing as an under-age person and luring someone into a trap where they are arrested is entrapment. Originally, the police were not involved and the person(s) were just exposed. No problem.

    However, I believe once you involve law enforcement, you cross the legal (not moral) line.

    Tell me where I'm wrong (and not YOU ConHog -- you don't know shit).

    Wanted or nor im going to give you conjoga facts. Ever see the show Bait Caar?

    Serjously, the last time you started this thread i posted the three elements required for sometging to be police entraoment and showed that this show does meet the legal standards to not be entrapment.

    Youre of course rntitled to your opinion but it means nothing in the face of court decisions that differ.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    49,579
    Thanks (Given)
    36105
    Thanks (Received)
    27789
    Likes (Given)
    3460
    Likes (Received)
    11179
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missileman View Post
    Whoa! Deja Vu
    How so?
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    49,579
    Thanks (Given)
    36105
    Thanks (Received)
    27789
    Likes (Given)
    3460
    Likes (Received)
    11179
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    Wanted or nor im going to give you conjoga facts. Ever see the show Bait Caar?

    Serjously, the last time you started this thread i posted the three elements required for sometging to be police entraoment and showed that this show does meet the legal standards to not be entrapment.

    Youre of course rntitled to your opinion but it means nothing in the face of court decisions that differ.
    My opinion seems to exceed your typing skills. Last time I posted this thread was on another board. I didn't agree with you then, nor do I agree with that reasoning now.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,799
    Thanks (Given)
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    59
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    835974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    How so?
    http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthre...088#post516088

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    My opinion seems to exceed your typing skills. Last time I posted this thread was on another board. I didn't agree with you then, nor do I agree with that reasoning now.
    Sorry, was on my Droid, hard to edit on that.

    And, no we discussed it on THIS board, as per the link MissileMan posted and in THAT thread I proved that it isn't police entrapment.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    49,579
    Thanks (Given)
    36105
    Thanks (Received)
    27789
    Likes (Given)
    3460
    Likes (Received)
    11179
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475548

    Default

    Okay, well just pretend I'm a noob and started an abortion thread.

    I'll see if I can't combine the two.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    49,579
    Thanks (Given)
    36105
    Thanks (Received)
    27789
    Likes (Given)
    3460
    Likes (Received)
    11179
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    Sorry, was on my Droid, hard to edit on that.

    And, no we discussed it on THIS board, as per the link MissileMan posted and in THAT thread I proved that it isn't police entrapment.
    Damn. Too bad for you. That means you were wrong on USMB and twice here.

    When you want to stop regurgitating the current misinterpretation and misuse of the law and address the misinterpreted INTENT of the law. let me know.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Damn. Too bad for you. That means you were wrong on USMB and twice here.

    When you want to stop regurgitating the current misinterpretation and misuse of the law and address the misinterpreted INTENT of the law. let me know.
    I honestly have no recollection of discussing this topic on USMB, but you had me thinking I was crazy when you posted that you hadn't debated it on THIS board.

    That being said, I posted the LEGAL standard for police entrapment, that show doesn't meet those standards. Now if you want to argue that the standards should be changed, well then by all means, argue that.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,760
    Thanks (Given)
    5669
    Thanks (Received)
    6731
    Likes (Given)
    5711
    Likes (Received)
    4154
    Piss Off (Given)
    36
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558182

    Default

    For every predator that was ''entrapped'' whether legal or not, is one less predator preying on our children.
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760251

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SassyLady View Post
    For every predator that was ''entrapped'' whether legal or not, is one less predator preying on our children.
    That there is a silly-slop sentence...
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,760
    Thanks (Given)
    5669
    Thanks (Received)
    6731
    Likes (Given)
    5711
    Likes (Received)
    4154
    Piss Off (Given)
    36
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558182

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noir View Post
    That there is a silly-slop sentence...
    yep...sometimes I get lazy and don't correct myself, especially when not using computer.
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In a house; two stories, suburban
    Posts
    7,471
    Thanks (Given)
    214
    Thanks (Received)
    264
    Likes (Given)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    7
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2395481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Okay, well just pretend I'm a noob and started an abortion thread.

    I'll see if I can't combine the two.
    Hmmmm. How bout a TV show that entices a pregnant 16 year old to get an abortion, and doesn't want her gay married dads to find out because they don't approve of having children out of wedlock? Maury Povich hosts.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    49,579
    Thanks (Given)
    36105
    Thanks (Received)
    27789
    Likes (Given)
    3460
    Likes (Received)
    11179
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    I honestly have no recollection of discussing this topic on USMB, but you had me thinking I was crazy when you posted that you hadn't debated it on THIS board.

    That being said, I posted the LEGAL standard for police entrapment, that show doesn't meet those standards. Now if you want to argue that the standards should be changed, well then by all means, argue that.
    Really. I thought the 5th Amendment to the US Constitution was the "legal standard". Your "legal standard" also does not jive with what used to be the "legal standard". So when did it change? What made it okay for law enforcement to engage in entrapping people?
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums