Queer Marriage

[OCA]

Originally Posted by Pale Rider
But Nuc, and no pun intended, I can gaurantee you that that homo couple is teaching that kid that what they do is "normal", and it isn't. That, my friend, is a lie.

I have to tell you that most of what Homosexual people do is Normal, even Hetros do it. It is not what I would want to do because to me it is gross. But it is still NORMAL. your appropriate word for it would be immoral. Which you may beleive is true.[/QUOTE]

Learn how to quote people.

Great, you think two guys fucking each other up the ass is normal, great.

It is normal for MAN AND WOMAN to do it, not two guys or for two chicks to snack on each other. This is unargueable, to argue your point further makes you look foolish and twisted.

[5stringJeff]

It doesn't explain behavior. Behavior defines homosexuality - not inclination.

Bingo.

[glockmail]

Marriage is simply another word, and in this case it means a murging or joining. It is only the religious which refuse an alternative definition. A LEGITIMATE alternative. (Check the closest dictionary).

Words have meaning. At least they used to. Queers should stay in the closet.

[Doniston]

Words have meaning. At least they used to. Queers should stay in the closet.

-*Three short sentences. three answers.

1. (to sentences one and two.) Of course, that is why I suggested checking the dictionary.

2. (one of two answers to sentence three) A one word question: "WHY"???

3. (Second response.) I have always beleived that those who are so afraid to recognise homosesexuals are also afraid of their own sexuality. For fear that they may be (just a teeny bit) Gay.

[Yurt]

-*Three short sentences. three answers.

1. (to sentences one and two.) Of course, that is why I suggested checking the dictionary.

2. (one of two answers to sentence three) A one word question: "WHY"???

3. (Second response.) I have always beleived that those who are so afraid to recognise homosesexuals are also afraid of their own sexuality. For fear that they may be (just a teeny bit) Gay.

As to 3:

So if one does not approve or condone of something, they are afraid? Do you support hetrosexual marriage only? If not, are you a closeted hetro...

[glockmail]

I have always beleived that those who are so afraid to recognise homosesexuals are also afraid of their own sexuality. For fear that they may be (just a teeny bit) Gay.

I find it so ironic that liberals always use gay as an insult to defend queers.

[gabosaurus]

Conservative Republicans are quick to hide their inner Foley-isms.

[OCA]

-:
3. (Second response.) I have always beleived that those who are so afraid to recognise homosesexuals are also afraid of their own sexuality. For fear that they may be (just a teeny bit) Gay.

LMFAO!

I think almost every single lib has scraped the bottom of the barrel and used that argument even though its a loser time and time again. You guys use it because you can't debate the facts on queers.

[Doniston]

I have to tell you that most of what Homosexual people do is Normal, even Hetros do it. It is not what I would want to do because to me it is gross. But it is still NORMAL. your appropriate word for it would be immoral. Which you may beleive is true.

Learn how to quote people.

interesting that you would say I should learn to quote properly, since the Quote attrinuted to me is Pale Riders quote, and the Quote above is actually mine.

Great, you think two guys fucking each other up the ass is normal, great.

It is normal for MAN AND WOMAN to do it, not two guys or for two chicks to snack on each other. This is unargueable, to argue your point further makes you look foolish and twisted.

out of curiosity, by what logic do you determine that a man doing it to a woman is moral, but a man doing it to a man is immoral??? Apparently it isn't the action, (which I find disgusting) but rather who is doing it to who. Now OMHO "THAT'S" twisted.

[Doniston]

I find it so ironic that liberals always use gay as an insult to defend queers.

Why do you think Gay is an insult? I certainly don't.

For your benefit, should I have said, that they were a bit insecure about their own Sexual orientation? Would that have been better??? and more acceptable???

[Doniston]

LMFAO!

I think almost every single lib has scraped the bottom of the barrel and used that argument even though its a loser time and time again. You guys use it because you can't debate the facts on queers.

it's never been a loser except to those who can't recognize fact when they see it. For further clarification, See Post 235.

[OCA]

interesting that you would say I should learn to quote properly, since the Quote attrinuted to me is Pale Riders quote, and the Quote above is actually mine.

out of curiosity, by what logic do you determine that a man doing it to a woman is moral, but a man doing it to a man is immoral??? Apparently it isn't the action, (which I find disgusting) but rather who is doing it to who. Now OMHO "THAT'S" twisted.

You completely fucked the original quote up so thats on you.

Man and woman, pardner, man and woman is all you need to remember.

[glockmail]

Why do you think Gay is an insult? I certainly don't.

For your benefit, should I have said, that they were a bit insecure about their own Sexual orientation? Would that have been better??? and more acceptable???

Interesting tactic: why is it an insult? Bullshit, but still interesting.

Its an insult because you know we find it immoral, abnornmal and unnatural. Being an intellectual, compassionalte and sensitive liberal you should have known that.

And for the record, I'm not unsure of the fact that I love women and would rather cut my pecker off than shove it in a guys ass.

[OCA]

it's never been a loser except to those who can't recognize fact when they see it. For further clarification, See Post 235.

Lol its intellectually lazy, it belies the truth, you have no argument.

[lily]

Conservative Republicans are quick to hide their inner Foley-isms.

Holy shit! Is he hung or what?