![Quote](images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Nell's Room
I don't like guns and I don't support the right to carry one (but one should be permitted to keep a gun in their homes for personal protection) but since they are legal, it is only fair to have a shooting range - but near a school? No matter how safe this range is claimed to be, there is always the risk that someone could get hurt.
They can have their shooting range, but it would be best to move it to a place away from the general public - especially schoolkids.
First - did you read the story?
Secondly - "there's always a risk"? Logical fallacy at best. The existence of ANY risk from ANYTHING "always" exists. Would you prohibit air traffic from flying over the school, because you know there's ALWAYS a risk the plane could hit the school. Cars, too - Drivers in Cars kill more americans than anything, yet cars are FREELY ALLOWED to whiz past the school. There's always a risk someone could get hurt, ya know...
There's NO risk a round could leave the indoor shooting facility and strike the school or anyone in/around it. When I use the word 'no' I mean to say 'the statisitcal risk is so low as to be non-existent.'
People like to get hopped up about buzzwords without looking at the facts.
“… the greatest detractor from high performance is fear: fear that you are not prepared, fear that you are in over your head, fear that you are not worthy, and ultimately, fear of failure. If you can eliminate that fear—not through arrogance or just wishing difficulties away, but through hard work and preparation—you will put yourself in an incredibly powerful position to take on the challenges you face" - Pete Carroll.