I don't get it
I was responding to a comment by another poster. I believe the subject is racism, not voters.
There were a lot of voters that voted against the dark lord because he's black. Many more than that voted for him because he's black. He has shown his own racism a number of times. As has holder with his "my people" comment. They get away with it because of the double standard that applies in govt today. White racism is not condoned and black racism shouldn't be either. And the "they do it too" argument gets really old.
When I die I'm sure to go to heaven, cause I spent my time in hell.
You get more with a kind word and a two by four, than you do with just a kind word.
"when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
"You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
“Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho
"when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
"You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
“Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho
"when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
"You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
“Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho
Brings up another valid point. There are MANY people opposed to Obama's policies who couldn't care less about his skin color. But MANY scream that anyone who disagree with him are racists PERIOD. That is of course no more true than saying anyone who supports him is a pro black racist.
Well, bravo for you. You respond how you like and I will respond how I like. That is the essence of Freedom of Speech. If you were to respond uncivilly back to a member I would not be so arrogant as to presume to point out the obvious to you. Of course you have every right to do so just as I have every right to ignore your unrequested opinion on the matter. Even more so since the matter is between myself and Conhog and not you. I have kindly chosen to point this out to you for your future reference should you need it. What you do with it is entirely your own business. Is that civil enough for you? Or do you wish me to say , please?
Which by the way, isn't going to happen..-Tyr
18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthre...irst-Amendment
The First Amendment does not guarantee that FJ will not infringe on your freedom of speech.
[QUOTE=ConHog;556254]That wasn't even what the discussion was about man. We were discussing VOTERS.
His comment was ever bit as in line as was yours and in my opinion vastly more so! . The thread topic is , The Most Racist Article That I've Ever Seen. So racism is more relevant to the topic than is voting. Does not matter if voting was being discussed because he brought it back to the primary point of the thread which is racism.. Glad to help you. If you ask I can do it more often for you.--Tyr
18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.