Hey...
I've been wanting to get back to this thread FOREVER but i just don't have time to do it Justice.
For those interested in looking into the why Evolution is piss poor science and basically dead.
why the big bang is in trouble and full of holes black and otherwise.
why the Earth is more than likely MUCH younger than many "know" it is.
One really great place to look and listen
is -real science radio- they sum up and link to various science issues along this line.
http://kgov.com/real-science-radio
For the Soft tissue in Dinosaur info they have on of the best, if not the best, pages on it.
the soft tissue is still UNEXPLAINABLE in the long timeline. And really does just disprove the 65million plus ages.
there's just no way soft tissue could survive for 65, 100, 150 million years. the molecular decay alone would turn the bio structures into dust. but they are so intact some researchers have been able to sequence some dinosaur proteins DNA.
there' NO way it's that old. and they are finding it in more and more dino bones. since they now know it's there and are looking for it.
the UNIVERSAL denials are over. Everyone KNEW that the tissue that old COULD NOT survive but now all of the alternative explanations have fallen FLAT and they are left saying. Well it's an "ANOMALY" (found over and over )or just scathing their heads.
as i've listened to some of the interviews with the discovers . I hear the disbelief in thier own words.
"So this is 65 million years old. " said with a question mark, rather than a period.
look if you want to follow the science let the science speak don't ASSUME that it MUST be old when the evidence says it's NOT.
But if the idea of an old earth is DOGMA then don't let the facts bug you. just keep on believing. you don't have to have evidence from dinosaurs. Believe what you want.
http://kgov.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue
someone earlier in the thread mention the rock layers as Proof.
well that's not true either.
in the Grand Canyon even there, there are a supposed 100s of millions of years of missing strata.
but zero evidence that those layers were washed away basically there's no evidence they were there.
its as if someone stolen 100 miillion years + and laid the the next hundred on top without leaving a trace.
an anomaly? maybe an alternative explanation fits the facts better.
And if you look at the mount Saint Helen Volcano and several other events like it. scientist have witnessed several hundreds of layers of sediment laid down over a matter of days and months. and seen a 4 story canyons craved in days. and miles of trees laid down FLAT, creating a bed of organic material. then covered with earth and stone. Tree uprooted stuck strait up in a new lake and then covered with layers of earth.
Catastrophe is an alternate explanation, that's been OBSERVED that causes structure like the grand cannon and other formations.
Like i said it more to it than i'll be able to really discus the way i'd like but if your interest please take a look at the links.
Log you mentioned the radiocarbon dating a few times as your gold standard.
I mention one area where it's be shown that the decay is NOT steady. to what degree is still an open question. the observation are brand new.
there are other issues with the method itself that make it suspect. but there is research that's investigating the creation of new radioactive material in the earth crust.
And one thing to consider, the presence of Carbon 14 in things like Diamonds that should be billions(?) of years old.
carbon 14 has a half life of 5700 years. If the whole earth was made of carbon 14 there would be None left in 50,000 years. But carbon 14 has been found in things that are said to be MUCH older. with NO good explanation as to why.
It's an Anomaly! or maybe the assumption of an old earth is just wrong.
Shouldn't the science answer the question. just asserting that it's old is not good enough. ignoring anomalies is not good science. it's DOGMA.
i can honestly say what
I'd like to find. can "real" scientist do the same. and still report the facts without fear of losing tenure?
i'm not willing to make stuff up or ignore facts. But i not going to lose a job, a grant or anything.
But i'm telling you honestly, it
horribly bad for the evolutionist.
and mighty shaky for the old earth crowd.
the big bangers are adding more epicycles and changing the numbers with every new observation
and the things they EXPECT to see often isn't showing up. but they still claim
everything PROVES their points.... As soon as they do a recalculations... They had to make big changes to the numbers for the amount of DARK mater and DARK energy a few weeks ago.
And the Galaxies they EXPECTED to be young and unformed, when they got a good look, because they are
closer to the big bang in time, look just like our galaxy and others,
mature. This was unexpected ... BUT of course it stills PROVES the big bang, even thought the predictions were flat wrong.
....
Comets should have all disappeared by now if the Solar system is as old as expected but..
it's Just an Anomaly. Scientist
BELIEVE there's a Cloud out there somewhere that feeding comets its
Unobserved... but it GOT to be there. because WE KNOW the solar system is X years old.
...
we don't go from fish to man in the womb,
There are no vestigial organs,
There is NO
Junk DNA , evolutionist were wrong again, again and again
etc etc etc
....
the fossil in China show that the 5 major types of animals basically came out of NOWHERE. and show little to no variation.
....
there are birds found with dinosaur bones and in dinosaur strata,
yes Birds. penguins, owls, flamingos and more. also squirrels and wolf like animals
...........
Like i said i've wanted to really get into this but
If your at all interested You might want to seriously take a look at the links above and do some exploring.
I've got some project coming i can't be around to comment though i'd LOVE to.
God lead you all.