Originally Posted by
Perianne
Interesting reading, Kathianne. I am slowly going through it. One thing I notice is his leaning towards the common law approach. For example, he says:
If so, how would/could he possibly explain gay marriage rulings?
I find his arguments flat. I say that with the caveat that he is infinitely more knowledgeable about the law than I am. However, HE is writing about ideas and not necessarily anything concrete.