Agreed. Absolutely. WELL SAID.
Even so, it's a fact that Ukraine DID suffer enormously (millions of lives were lost in Ukraine alone !). It's more than understandable that many if not most in that country will be no less than desperate to cut all ties with Russia, permanently.
... and with Putin, the ex-KGB colonel ......
It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!
If it helps you decide who are or are not the Nazis ... Ukraine hasn't attacked British soil with any chemical weapons. They regard NATO, in fact, as their friend, I understand. Russia, undoubtedly, HAS attacked us with chemical weapons. It's been killing its opposition. And it doesn't care if others die who are in range, either.
Hitler did that sort of thing, in spades ....
I don't usually use Al Jazeera for material. Here, though, they are helpful ...
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/...054257166.html
Hitler believed in 'Might is Right'. We are very clear, over here in the West, that Putin sees his approach to international affairs in much the same way.NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has called on Russia to use its "considerable influence" to end fighting in eastern Ukraine after a renewed surge in violence there.
Moscow-backed rebels and government forces have traded blame for the flare-up in the industrial east that has seen the highest casualty rate since mid-December and cut off power and water to thousands of civilians on both sides of the front line.
The shelling eased on Wednesday, but the January 29 to 31 clashes near the Kiev-held frontline town of Avdiyivka brought the festering conflict back into focus amid warnings of a looming humanitarian crisis.
"We call for an immediate return to the ceasefire," Stoltenberg said in Brussels. "We call on Russia to use its considerable influence over the separatists to bring the violence to an end."
Hitler annexed Austria. Putin annexed Crimea. Good luck in spotting meaningful differences ....
Last edited by Drummond; 03-17-2018 at 04:13 PM.
It's That Bloody Foreigner Again !!!
Finland has been a country since the Stone Age. It lost some land to the Soviets, but the Fins (who WERE aided by the White Russians) managed to keep its autonomy. The Soviets demanded war reparations after WWII and the Fins had to industrialize to pay them back. What the reparations were for beats me, and why Finland paid them is also a mystery to me. It's basically rated as one THE best countries in the world to live in.
Must be too cold there or that rating of best country to live in would definitely bring about its ruin. Every loser in the world would descend on the place.
The "Nazi" thing sounds like the left and right, politically, here in the US. The left calls the right Nazi's when it is they who are the Nazi's. Socialists that run around in mobs rioting and destroying things (in the name of "peace" no less) and thinking freedom of speech means you can speak what they tell you is about as Nazi as it gets.
Politics are weird. I heard at some point that Ukrainians who joined the 3rd Reich did so because they hated Stalin. A lot of the world's current alliances are completely stupid but based on some real or imagined viewpoint. The people and their cultures are secondary to lines drawn in the sand. From what I read, Ukraine could very-well be 3 different countries.
My point is simple, and not to pass judgement because I listen to what you are saying about the people. I also know what the law says. Russia defined the boundaries of Ukraine in the 1920s. They accepted them as boundaries all during the Soviet era, and when the Soviet Union officially dissolved and recognized those boundaries. Russia violated the law by its own agreements.
That is why Russia is considered the bad guys in this instance. It isn't acceptable anymore to just take a country or a portion of it just because you want to. That quit being acceptable in the 1950s.
It'll be awhile before anyone accepts Russia's claim, if they ever do. As the Nations are now, they will not.
I have a totally off-topic question that has nothing to do with politics. If I have a Russian girlfriend who speaks only Russian and I do not, am I still in as much trouble as I am when some American girl is yelling at me for some perceived slight? Or is it different since I can't understand a word she's saying?
.
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke
Depends on girl, I think![]()
And it is complicated to get a girlfriend, if you don't understand anything?
Bbbbut I think, that because of that you will be in less trouble
But I never was under US girl's yelling, so, who knows.
Guys, I don't think, that I can answer to all of that![]()
I really believe, that the annexion of Crimea was not a mistake (the only one notamistake for a long time). I don't think, that I can convince you to take my side. But you can't convince me, that it was bad.
I know your position, you know mine, but nor you, or me can do anything with the reality. As I know, people of Crimea think, that their life become better. And that, as I think, is important.
And I think, that it's only our buisness. No offence.
Had Russia not acknowledged Ukraine's declaration of independence and recognized it as a sovereign nation I would agree it would be your business. Since most of the world recognizes Ukraine as a sovereign nation and has since 1991, it is the world's business from a legal standpoint.
I'm more than willing to let the world figure it out too. If it was that important to them, NATO should have acted immediately; otherwise, what is NATO worth?
I think women are the same everywhere which means I would be in just as much trouble there as here. I've just got it like that![]()
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke
Hell no. I'm a bit older than you. Girls and I don't get along. It's not that I don't like them. They just get mad at me all the time![]()
I don't even know what the American ones are pissed off at half the time and I CAN understand what they are saying. All I need is one I can't even understand WTF I'm getting bitched out about![]()
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke
YOU are what is outdated. I'm well-aware of the bridge and even when it was going to open. A bridge does not change international boundaries.
Sorry. It's an illegal land grab until an international court and the international community say otherwise. All there is to it.
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke
America didn't ask anyone when it bombed Yugoslavia. America didn't ask anyone when it entered Iraq. The UN security Council did not give America the right.
You have completely missed the point here, On more than one level.
First, it's YOU crying about some bullshit law you invented and pulled out your ass about the proof of the military grade chemical used to poison the 2 Brits.
Now, for your convenience, international law doesn't matter where Crimea is concerned. So WHICH ONE IS It, COMMIE? It counts or it doesn't but you don't get to pick and choose when it does or doesn't as it suits you.
Second, as I already stated, that bridge doesn't make your claim any more legal than before the bridge. It just means there's a bridge.
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke