Equal Rights For Homosexuals: 82Marine89 v Hogtrash

[OCA]

FJ, why is it that you love the homosexuals so much?

I think the answer is glaringly clear there, probably likes Bette Midler and show tunes.

[fj1200]

Obviously you aren't bright enough to use absurdity to shine the light on absurdity which is what queer choice marriage is.................fucking absurd.

Absurd is using a stupid analogy to equate homosexuality and violence.

Jesus, where do these idiots come from?

Good question, from my perspective you just got here but your post count says otherwise.

[fj1200]

I think the answer is glaringly clear there, probably likes Bette Midler and show tunes.

There it is, lose the debate and throw out the "closet gay" argument.

[jimnyc]

There it is, lose the debate and throw out the "closet gay" argument.

And yet the queer supporters call others homophobic and state that some of us must have "gay tendencies" if it bothers us so much. Funny how I don't see that bothering you.

[fj1200]

No, I said they deserved help. Fuck 'em if they don't want it, but I sure as shit don't think they deserve to be catered to as a result of their deviant and destructive lifestyle.

Good for you, don't cater to them but don't think that they want "special rights" when your happy to have your "rights" validated by government.

[OCA]

So, you asked the question. You believe we should force "help" on them then?

No, it should not be forced upon them nor should it be denied them which is what the current queer choice and APA leadership is trying to do.

If they seek out said lifestyle choice laws should not be created for them in order that they may avoid the consequences of their destructive choice.

[fj1200]

And yet the queer supporters call others homophobic and state that some of us must have "gay tendencies" if it bothers us so much. Funny how I don't see that bothering you.

Have I done that?

[jimnyc]

Have I done that?

What, point out that those using it as a debate technique against those opposed to queers? Not that I am aware of.

[fj1200]

No, it should not be forced upon them nor should it be denied them which is what the current queer choice and APA leadership is trying to do.

If they seek out said lifestyle choice laws should not be created for them in order that they may avoid the consequences of their destructive choice.

As I said:

Good for you, don't cater to them but don't think that they want "special rights" when your happy to have your "rights" validated by government.

[OCA]

There it is, lose the debate and throw out the "closet gay" argument.

Lose? LMFAO!

Not only am I a fucking debate giant i'm also the Greek fucking Chris Rock.

[fj1200]

What, point out that those using it as a debate technique against those opposed to queers? Not that I am aware of.

Then there is no point in bringing it up to me then.

[fj1200]

Lose? LMFAO!

Not only am I a fucking debate giant i'm also the Greek fucking Chris Rock.

Not that I've seen so far.

[OCA]

Absurd is using a stupid analogy to equate homosexuality and violence.



Good question, from my perspective you just got here but your post count says otherwise.

Correct, my mistake....I should've said "retarded" is not being able to understand the analogy.

[jimnyc]

And to move a point here from a thread that is off topic.... FJ thinks because of a Gallup poll that Americans are becoming more supportive than against gay marriage. As I have asked there, I am curious as to how many states adopted bans against queer marriage when put to the people and how many have allowed it when voted by the people?

Anyone know the answer?

[OCA]

Not that I've seen so far.

At my wife's work they sell cataract glasses, shall I get you a pair? Or do you need a refresher course on comprehension?