After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown
“Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
-Abbey
If we were as industrious to become good as to make ourselves great, we should become really great by being good, and the number of valuable men would be much increased; but it is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness; and i pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous." - Ben Franklin
Imagine what good we can do if we all joined together, united as followers of Christ - M. Russell Ballard
actually...there is.... you go to Chicago... you walk up to his house... you knock on the door, and when he answers the door, you ask him.
That is a fairly good way, but, given the fact that I really don't CARE why Louie said something nice about Barack, I'll let you go to the Windy City and then you can report back on what he says. OK?
If we were as industrious to become good as to make ourselves great, we should become really great by being good, and the number of valuable men would be much increased; but it is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness; and i pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous." - Ben Franklin
Imagine what good we can do if we all joined together, united as followers of Christ - M. Russell Ballard
For all intents and purposes mfm, I'd say hussein's denunciation of farrakhan is hollow. It's all for show. It's what he wants you white boys to believe, when in secret, farrakhan is his buddy. He needs you whiteys to vote for him, so of course he's going to put on the charade. IMO, I believe it's all a lie.
Last edited by Pale Rider; 02-27-2008 at 06:48 PM.
Please don't put words in my post. I never said that you said Farrakhan likes Obama's policies. I suggested, and quite logically at that, that if Farrakhan supports Obama, it would be interesting to know which policies and values of Obama's he identifies with. Whether you personally know the answer is irrelevant.
But since you are such an ardent Obama supporter, you might want to find out the answer. Or do you not care that Farrakhan identifies with your man? Personally, if he was my candidate, I would want to know exactly why.
After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown
“Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
-Abbey
he danced the dance and was let off easy by the moderators. the guy didn't even know there was a difference between "rejecting" and "denouncing." and this guy is supposed to be a harvard law grad?
further, when he finally capitulated or basically he knew hillary got em so he tried as fast as he could to sweep that under the rug, he only """denounced""" him in that well then rejection and denouncing are basically the same, THEN OK, i reject and denounce him.
it may fool most sheeple like MFM, but it doesn't pass muster for the rest of who were really listening with objective understanding, unlike those who have fallen in love with him blindly.
he only renounced him after being put on the spot, and EVEN then, he equated it with "rejecting." they are very different words and apparently your harvard smarty pants doesn't know this. i just watched a group interview of dems on tv and even they said he didn't really denounce and danced around the whole issue. he saved face, thats all.
and why did it take him being put on the spot to do that? why not the day before? face it, he has already tacitly approved of the endorsement and by extension, the endorsor.